BK
"Goalie Apologist"
Drafting #2 is like worst case scenario for me. I'd rather be drafting #1 for Hughes, #3 for Turcotte/Byram, or staying around #7-8 for Boldy/Krebs/Zegras/Pelletier
Lol what?
Drafting #2 is like worst case scenario for me. I'd rather be drafting #1 for Hughes, #3 for Turcotte/Byram, or staying around #7-8 for Boldy/Krebs/Zegras/Pelletier
There should be absolutely no way Kakko is worst case scenario.
Kakko is #2 on my list. I fully acknowledge his skill. Just on a personal level I don't care for him.You don’t like Kakko? Everything I read about him is exactly what this team needs.
Kakko is #2 on my list. I fully acknowledge his skill. Just on a personal level I don't care for him.
I value leadership. Guys who are good in the locker room and who can be a representative face for the team.Care to elaborate why?
I value leadership. Guys who are good in the locker room and who can be a representative face for the team.
I'm not saying every player has to be that. It's just something I like and it doesn't affect my rankings.
Drafting down is certainly a possibility.I can see someone saying they don't want a certain player at #2, I just don't really see that with Kakko but to each their own. I said it before and will say it again - I think this top 10 is deep enough that if we pick anywhere outside the top 3, I can see Bowman dropping down a bit to the 7-9 range if they feel "their" guy will be there, and their guy is usually a bit different than most.
I am only cool with that if we package our 2nd in that move or another piece and get to move into the late 1st with us dropping down. I have no delusions of getting Knight as I think he goes higher than most will acknowledge right now - but a kid like Bobby Brink rings Kelley/Bowman all day every day - skill, skill, skill and underrated.
I don't see him having a voice in the room. He doesn't really speak English or at least he's very shy when it comes to speaking the language. Panarin is the same way. Obviously an incredible amount of skill there but that guy is never going to step in and rally up the team after rough period or be out there to address the media as a spokesperson.And Kakko at 17-18 years old you already know has poor leadership qualities?
you and Pelletier lol...that is your guy this year I see!Drafting down is certainly a possibility.
Let's say we get leapfrogged by 2 teams, and we're picking at #9. I don't mind trading 9th overall to Minnesota for 14th + 44th overall (just an example).
Then trade 44th + 38th (our second) to move up to a mid 20 pick.
Draft Brink + Pelletier with 14th and mid 20 pick.
I don't see him having a voice in the room. He doesn't really speak English or at least he's very shy when it comes to speaking the language. Panarin is the same way. Obviously an incredible amount of skill there but that guy is never going to step in and rally up the team after rough period or be out there to address the media as a spokesperson.
Between Pelletier, Caufield, Brink, and Hoglander, it's a great year for smaller wingers. Sheshin and Strondala are also worth mentioning.you and Pelletier lol...that is your guy this year I see!
I would be fine with that as well, I would prefer to not drop out of the top 10 at all, it would depend on where that other 1st would land us. I trust Kelley and Bowman with getting us guys regardless of where we pick, but this organization needs another top 10 pick IMO though your scenario has us at 9th OV so yeah not a massive drop there either.
I've said nothing about not drafting him. BPA is the way to go and I have him #2. That being said, I'm allowed to have favourites and Kakko isn't one. Hughes, Byram, Turcotte, Krebs, Pelletier, Boldy, Pelletier, Hoglander are all guys that I "like" more. Doesn't mean I think they should all be drafted ahead of Kakko.Based on what? Leadership is also stepping up in big moments and he has done that (WJC). Not wanting to draft a player due to language at this point is basically not wanting to draft a player because he is a ginger.
You are making claims here that are not really true. If he can yell “Let’s ****ing go” he can rally the team. You don’t have to give an Any Given Sunday speech to rally a team...
Kakko’s talent and ability is why you take him not because he can talk tor he media or rally the team.
don't forget Rhett Pitlick - cousin of Tyler Pitlick and brother to Rhem Pitlick - kid lit up Minny HS and now in the USHL where he looks good too...seems to be a name creeping in some top 45 lists now.Between Pelletier, Caufield, Brink, and Hoglander, it's a great year for smaller wingers. Sheshin and Strondala are also worth mentioning.
I started the thread on him! Definitely a name to watch out for.don't forget Rhett Pitlick - cousin of Tyler Pitlick and brother to Rhem Pitlick - kid lit up Minny HS and now in the USHL where he looks good too...seems to be a name creeping in some top 45 lists now.
well then you know of him lol!!!I started the thread on him! Definitely a name to watch out for.
I've said nothing about not drafting him. BPA is the way to go and I have him #2. That being said, I'm allowed to have favourites and Kakko isn't one. Hughes, Byram, Turcotte, Krebs, Pelletier, Boldy, Pelletier, Hoglander are all guys that I "like" more. Doesn't mean I think they should all be drafted ahead of Kakko.
That's your opinion. I have mine.I am arguing that your claims about leadership, etc are unfounded and most likely not accurate.
That's your opinion. I have mine.
Lack of English is in the fact that there is zero documentation of him speaking a word of the language. He always uses a translator.Can you provide any proof or documentation at all regarding his lack of leadership and lack of English?
Lack of English is in the fact that there is zero documentation of him speaking a word of the language. He always uses a translator.
Leadership shouldn't be an issue in Finland, but if he comes over here he'll have a tough time communicating with his teammates.