Line Combos: 2019-2020 Line/D Pairing discussions & proposals

The National

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2017
29,112
31,730
Los Angeles
Yeah, Sweeney has said he's in the mix for that spot, along with the prospects. He said he likes Ritchie's possession game and that he hopes Ritchie can get back to his 16 goal form from a couple years ago, that he's played well when given the chance to play with talent.

Well hope he’s correct, when DK has some size on his line that also can actually move, things seem to go well for him. Although, wouldn’t mind them trying Pasta there as well.

Currently I’d like:

Marchand - Berg - Heinen
Debrusk/Cehlarik - Krejci - Pasta
Bjork/Debrusk - Coyle - Ritchie
Nordy - Kuraly - Wags

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
Grz - Clifton
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak
Debrusk-Krejci-Senyshyn
Heinen-Coyle-Bjork
Nordstrom-Kuraly-Wagner

Cehlarik is a big question mark. I don’t see him making the team over any of the top 3 LWs.
 

wintersej

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 26, 2011
22,473
17,637
North Andover, MA
Forgive me as this will get long. Trying to gather my thoughts on all this and it being 100000 degrees outside today makes it a good time. A core thing to keep in mind here is that this isn't fantasy hockey. This is about finding line combos that become greater than the sum of their parts with complementary skill sets.

1) Do you keep 63/37/88 together?

Right now Pastrnak is not a great puck control player. Most of his (5 on 5) goals are coming off the rush or off of one timers where someone else is doing the puck protecting and the cycling in the offensive zone.

This is not a shot at Pasta. He is one of the best young wingers in the game. As Pasta gets more size, he should be able to improve that part of his game, but as it stands now, being paired with 63/37 allows him to get carried a bit when the Bruins have controlled possession in the offensive zone at 5 on 5. Marchand, in particular, really makes that line work. He has years of working the Bergeron on the cycle, is great at seeing lanes to pass to Bergy or Pasta, and on the rush he and Pasta are deadly.

Removing Pastrnak from 63/37 would not only hurt his former line mates, but we now have to find line mates for Pasta that can still 1) do most of the possession work in the offensive zone, 2) have the IQ to get Pasta the puck, 3) can keep up with Pasta on the rush.

If you move Pasta down to play with Krejci, you have an issue with #1. Krejci has always been at his best when he has guys with size that can provide Krejci with time and space, can cycle, and can take Krejci's passes and put them in the back of the net. Krejci does NOT need exactly those players, Krejci+Pasta have connected on some nice one timers, but for both Krejci and Pasta to be at their best, the need someone with size that can help them with possession in the offensive zone.

DeBrusk currently is not that guy. Like with Pasta, as he physically matures that part of his game can grow, but as it stands DeBrusk is someone who wants someone to get the puck on his stick and let him slash to the net with quickness and finish. A DeBrusk/Krejci/Pasta line is a line with talent that will score goals, but won't possess the puck enough to keep the other team from scoring their fair share as well.

The reason why Cehlarik worked so well with Krejci and Pasta is he can absolutely take care of puck possession and make nice little passes and plays. Cehlarik is able to use his size and IQ in the offensive zone to help both Krejci and Pasta play their best games. The problem is that Cehlarik just isn't a great skater and between Cehlarik and Krejci you have effectively taken away Pastrnak's wheels 10 year early. Add to that, that while 46+88 have looked their best together while playing with Cehlarik, its not like Cehlarik himself has been able to act as more than a glue guy and actually put the puck in the net. If you are going to break up 63 and 88... the Krejci line better be scoring like a first line.

Honestly, the best person to play with Krejci and Pasta is a left handed version of Charlie Coyle that has a little more willingness to shoot the puck. Or a version of Sean Kuraly with some offensive IQ. Or a Cehlarik with speed. Or a DeBrusk that can slow down and protect the puck and create space. None of those players right now are the right player.

While in an ideal world you do spread the talent across the lineup, unless they get help from outside the organization, or unless Cehlarik makes a jump, you are breaking up a great 1st line (with no clear answer for RW in place) and you are putting together a 2nd line that don't cover their weaknesses well.

TLDR is that to break up 63/37/88, you need to get a LW that can cover 1, 2 and 3 above and that guy doesn't look to be on the roster.

2) If Pastrnak stays on the 1st line, who plays RW with Krejci?

First, I think that unless you bring in another LW from outside the organization, DeBrusk is your #2 LW. You can make the arguments about Kessel being on the 3rd line in Pittsburgh all you want, but the Bruins are short top 6 forward talent before you move DeBrusk down a line. The Bruins don't have Crosby and Malkin.

As outlined above, DeBrusk isn't the perfect linemate for Krejci. While Krejci is one of the best passers in the league, DeBrusk doesn't really do much to give him time and space to operate and nor does DeBrusk slow his game down that great. While DeBrusk can certainly be part of a Krejci line (Krejci does a very good job of getting the puck on DeBrusk's stick when DeBrusk has a path to the net) they need someone that can bridge the gap between them. Marchand makes Bergeron and Pasta work. The Krejci line needs someone that make DeBrusk and Krejci work. DeBrusk needs someone who can keep up on the rush + someone that can help with the possession game and Krejci needs another person who can help with creating time and space and working the cycle.

Coyle could be that guy. Someone who can control and puck and make space and give the skill guys room to operate. Of course, you then really mess up your 3rd line, and a lot of folks would grow to not like Coyle on a line with Krejci as Coyle is a guy who just doesn't shoot the puck enough.

Kuhlman has enough speed to keep up with DeBrusk, is tenacious on the forecheck and isn't afraid to shoot. He checks a lot of boxes in what you are looking for in completing that line. But, does he have top 6 talent? Seems like a big ask.

Senyshyn is along the same lines. Big and fast, but has his Providence training in "bottom 6 skills" put him in a position to use his natural talent and a rounded out game as a top 6 wing on a Cup contender? Seems like a big ask.

Back when Seguin was dealt, I would have thought Ritchie is someone that would have checked all the boxes as a RW for Krejci. Heck... maybe playing with Krejci and DeBrusk he can be physical and score 15-20 goals. Seems like a big ask.

Bjork probably fits well with DeBrusk, but not sure if Bjork+DeBrusk work great with Krejci. Those two wingers really need a different kind of center. Which brings us to the crux of the matter...

The Bruins are trying to build a team around skill on the wing and responsible possession guys up the middle and Krejci is out of that mold... but he is still a low end #1 to high end #2 C... and those don't grow on trees. So while Boston doesn't seem to be interested in getting another Oates, Janney, Savard, Allison, Barzal or Krejci pass first offensively focused skill guy at C, they have one now.

You can find a "RW for Krejci"... one that has size and puck control skills, but he has to be someone that is good enough to be in that role in a post-Krejci world. Finding some modern day Lucic or Horton that can skate and be worth the cost after Krejci is gone... but that you can fit under the cap and are able to acquire seems like an impossible list. Mark Stone certainly checked a lot of boxes, but the Bruins really could put together a package to match Vegas realistically, nor do they have the cap space right now. And, more importantly, at what point to you decide that "finding a center for DeBrusk and Pasta" starts making more sense than finding a winger for Krejci?

3) Who fits with Coyle and Heinen?

Speed. Senyshyn, Bjork, Kuhlman. All those guys fit the bill. Not worried.

So I guess after all that you are left with a few options.

1) Stay the course

Let Kuhlman, Senyshyn, Ritchie and Bjork fight over the two middle 6 RW spots and go deadline shopping again for a rental. Maybe Studnicka or Frederic force Coyle up to #2RW.

This seems most likely. I feel very confident in one of those guys sticking on the 3rd line and like the chemistry potential.

Marchand Bergeron Pastrnak
DeBrusk Krejci Kuhlman/Senyshyn/Ritchie
Heinen Coyle Kuhlman/Senyshyn/Bjork

Frolik, Toffoli, Hoffman, etc become names we talk about in the spring to play RW with Krejci.

This is actually the most simple plan and the one that makes the most sense. But it's not very fun.

2) Give Cehlarik a shot

Marchand Bergeron Heinen
Cehlarik Krejci Pastrnak
DeBrusk Coyle Kuhlman/Senyshyn/Bjork

I like 63/37/43 as a two way line. A lot. But, it only works if the Krejci line can be a real #1 line offensively. Cehlarik will have had to had some kind of offseason to be a REAL top 6 player. Love the third line, but I love the third line with Heinen, too.

3) Go get someone signed long term at RW

Someone that can bridge Krejci+DeBrusk and keep the first line as is.

This has been the desired path for a long time, but I think it might be too late to find a guy that will work with DeBrusk and Krejci and also DeBrusk and Krejci's replacement we hope is Studnicka but don't know. I just don't know who this guy is. And I don't know how you afford his salary. And I don't know how you trade for him.

4) Go get a LW that can bridge Krejci+Pasta

And move DeBrusk to 3rd line.

This honestly would be more of a move planning for the post-Krejci world. A LW that can bridge between Krejci+Pasta likely has the skill set to be there when Studnicka or Coyle or whomever is going to be there. Kreider and Hall are the most obvious names. Names that would require moving on from Krejci after the season and would make DeBrusk a "luxury" on the 3rd line. This would be the most drastic move.
 

wintersej

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 26, 2011
22,473
17,637
North Andover, MA
^^^ An asterisk on above.

@PlayMakers does have an interesting thought with Heinen+Krejci and DeBrusk+Coyle as pairs that I didn't really address. Those guys might be more natural fits in style. But, I think you are left in a similar position. We have wingers that can fit with DeBrusk and Coyle. The winger that fits with Heinen and Krejci is what Ritchie was supposed to be, not what he is.
 

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com
First off, this post was so good it should be required reading. Well done @wintersej, that was better than most pay to read columns.
:clap:


its not like Cehlarik himself has been able to act as more than a glue guy and actually put the puck in the net. If you are going to break up 63 and 88... the Krejci line better be scoring like a first line.

I think it's too early to say Cehlarik is or isn't that guy. He has less than 40 NHL games under his belt. Sobotka was given something like 140+ games, Caron played a 130 games as a Bruin before they pulled the plug. Cehlarik has had flashes, games where he looked like a legit top6 guy. The Philly game last year was a good example, but even the next handful of games, he was very good. You're right he doesn't have the wheels and that may be why he's not the right fit long-term but he doesn't have to be the long-term solution. Just a competent 2nd liner until you decide what to do with Krejci vs Coyle.

The Bruins are trying to build a team around skill on the wing and responsible possession guys up the middle and Krejci is out of that mold

I agree. Krejci really doesn't fit the mold of what he's trying to build. He's great, and they seem to be content to run with him until the young centers are ready but the next wave is different from him, and might require a different set of linemates, especially if they expect to get their physical play from their C's.

3) Who fits with Coyle and Heinen?

Speed.

I'd add that it's not just speed, but speed and the ability to carry the puck and gain zone entries. One of the reasons Johansson made that line go was because he was so good at transporting the puck through the Nzone and then setting up linemates. Bjork has that ability (in spades). Senyshyn can carry but he's not a great passer. Kuhlman has speed but I don't recall him being a big puck carrier blue line to blue line. That could be a function of playing with DeBrusk, I don't know.

So I guess after all that you are left with a few options.

Another option would be to put together a line of Heinen - Krejci - Ritchie. I think Heinen would be a great possession RW for Krejci, a passer who can think the game on a high level. The guy that Ritchie was supposed to be would fit in perfectly. But will he ever be that guy? I don't know, but I'm pretty confident he has a better chance of succeeding if Heinen (a passer) is the other wing on his line, as opposed to DeBrusk who rarely gives the puck up once he gets it.

I think the best long-term RW for DeBrusk could be Bjork. He has the speed to keep up with JDB, and he's a playmaker so he's not going to rely on Jake to give him the puck (in fact, we could see some fantastic high speed plays go from Bjork to DeBruskit will work the other way around). Put a big, two way center between them like Coyle (or Studnicka/Frederic down the line) and you've got a pretty dynamic line. I know you don't like putting DeBrusk on the third line, but maybe it's a way to see if Coyle can be a 2c?
 
Last edited:

wintersej

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 26, 2011
22,473
17,637
North Andover, MA
First off, this post was so good it should be required reading. Well done @wintersej, that was better than most pay to read columns.
:clap:




I think it's too early to say Cehlarik is or isn't that guy. He has less than 40 NHL games under his belt. Sobotka was given something like 140+ games, Caron played a 130 games as a Bruin before they pulled the plug. Cehlarik has had flashes, games where he looked like a legit top6 guy. The Philly game last year was a good example, but even the next handful of games, he was very good. You're right he doesn't have the wheels and that may be why he's not the right fit long-term but he doesn't have to be the long-term solution. Just a competent 2nd liner until you decide what to do with Krejci vs Coyle.



I agree. Krejci really doesn't fit the mold of what he's trying to build. He's great, and they seem to be content to run with him until the young centers are ready but the next wave is different from him, and might require a different set of linemates, especially if they expect to get their physical play from their C's.



I'd add that it's not just speed, but speed and the ability to carry the puck and gain zone entries. One of the reasons Johansson made that line go was because he was so good at transporting the puck through the Nzone and then setting up linemates. Bjork has that ability (in spades). Senyshyn can carry but he's not a great passer. Kuhlman has speed but I don't recall him being a big puck carrier blue line to blue line. That could be a function of playing with DeBrusk, I don't know.



Another option would be to put together a line of Heinen - Krejci - Ritchie. I think Heinen would be a great possession RW for Krejci, a passer who can think the game on a high level. The guy that Ritchie was supposed to be would fit in perfectly. But will he ever be that guy? I don't know, but I'm pretty confident he has a better chance of succeeding if Heinen (a passer) is the other wing on his line, as opposed to DeBrusk who rarely gives the puck up once he gets it.

I think the best long-term RW for DeBrusk could be Bjork. He has the speed to keep up with JDB, and he's a playmaker so he's not going to rely on Jake to give him the puck (in fact, we could see some fantastic high speed plays go from Bjork to DeBruskit will work the other way around). Put a big, two way center between them like Coyle (or Studnicka/Frederic down the line) and you've got a pretty dynamic line. I know you don't like putting DeBrusk on the third line, but maybe it's a way to see if Coyle can be a 2c?

Thanks for the kind words. Agree with what you are saying. Especially on the third line and zone entries and Johansson and Bjork. And DeBrusk and Bjork being a good match.

I'm down to try Ritchie with Krejci and whomever including Heinen. I'm also down to try Cehlarik with 46 and 88, but it feels a bit like when I was hoping that Trotman could be a partner for Chara...I can list some logical reasons, but there are a lot of big obvious reasons around talent to state why it won't work.
 

Alan Ryan

Registered User
Jun 1, 2006
9,075
1,519
Matt Porter of the Globe projects the line-up for 2019-20, plus comments on other players who could make an impact: Projecting the 2019-20 Bruins depth chart: mid-July edition - The Boston Globe

No real surprises here as the Bruins were not going to make wholesale changes to a line-up that was so successful in 2018-19. The only new face is Ritchie.

Porter's list for the start of the season (leaving out injured players Miller and Moore):

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Krejci - Kuhlman
Heinen - Coyle - Ritchie
Nordstrom - Kuraly - Wagner

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
Grzelcyk - Clifford

Rask
Halak

How does this compare to your preferred line-up? I think it's a good one. I do wonder if they will try Ritchie on RW with Krejci, using Kuhlman on RW with Coyle.
 

JOKER 192

Blow it up
Sponsor
Jun 14, 2010
20,119
19,466
Montreal,Canada
Forgive me as this will get long. Trying to gather my thoughts on all this and it being 100000 degrees outside today makes it a good time. A core thing to keep in mind here is that this isn't fantasy hockey. This is about finding line combos that become greater than the sum of their parts with complementary skill sets.

I like what you did here , brilliant analysis.
 

Bumper

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
560
254
(Only) Halfway To Everywhere
Kuhlman was (somehow quietly) the team's most effective player this past season. I don't need you to believe me -- I trust my math. I very strongly advocate for a proper trial for Kuhlman in Pastrnak's old spot. the preseason and first month or so should be exciting as a lot of young guys press for spots. I hold a lot of hope for Cehlarik, a dude who was also extremely effective in all of his chances until his most recent one, which was bad enough to sink his outlier status into the average second-liner territory, which is probably his real role to shine from, which I expect again. I think Kuhlman has made his linemates so much better that a bad week for him would not dip him below anybody else on the roster as far as being a game-changing positive influence. Clifton comes the closest to such a status among the defensemen. that defensive right side is perfect if Miller stays on as the substitute. I am excited for the lineups to take shape. this is a top-tier team.
 

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,379
New England
Kuhlman was (somehow quietly) the team's most effective player this past season. I don't need you to believe me -- I trust my math. I very strongly advocate for a proper trial for Kuhlman in Pastrnak's old spot. the preseason and first month or so should be exciting as a lot of young guys press for spots. I hold a lot of hope for Cehlarik, a dude who was also extremely effective in all of his chances until his most recent one, which was bad enough to sink his outlier status into the average second-liner territory, which is probably his real role to shine from, which I expect again. I think Kuhlman has made his linemates so much better that a bad week for him would not dip him below anybody else on the roster as far as being a game-changing positive influence. Clifton comes the closest to such a status among the defensemen. that defensive right side is perfect if Miller stays on as the substitute. I am excited for the lineups to take shape. this is a top-tier team.

No he wasn't. Your made up player rating system has no basis here
 
  • Like
Reactions: JOKER 192

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,355
20,675
Victoria BC
Forgive me as this will get long. Trying to gather my thoughts on all this and it being 100000 degrees outside today makes it a good time. A core thing to keep in mind here is that this isn't fantasy hockey. This is about finding line combos that become greater than the sum of their parts with complementary skill sets.

1) Do you keep 63/37/88 together?

Right now Pastrnak is not a great puck control player. Most of his (5 on 5) goals are coming off the rush or off of one timers where someone else is doing the puck protecting and the cycling in the offensive zone.

This is not a shot at Pasta. He is one of the best young wingers in the game. As Pasta gets more size, he should be able to improve that part of his game, but as it stands now, being paired with 63/37 allows him to get carried a bit when the Bruins have controlled possession in the offensive zone at 5 on 5. Marchand, in particular, really makes that line work. He has years of working the Bergeron on the cycle, is great at seeing lanes to pass to Bergy or Pasta, and on the rush he and Pasta are deadly.

Removing Pastrnak from 63/37 would not only hurt his former line mates, but we now have to find line mates for Pasta that can still 1) do most of the possession work in the offensive zone, 2) have the IQ to get Pasta the puck, 3) can keep up with Pasta on the rush.

If you move Pasta down to play with Krejci, you have an issue with #1. Krejci has always been at his best when he has guys with size that can provide Krejci with time and space, can cycle, and can take Krejci's passes and put them in the back of the net. Krejci does NOT need exactly those players, Krejci+Pasta have connected on some nice one timers, but for both Krejci and Pasta to be at their best, the need someone with size that can help them with possession in the offensive zone.

DeBrusk currently is not that guy. Like with Pasta, as he physically matures that part of his game can grow, but as it stands DeBrusk is someone who wants someone to get the puck on his stick and let him slash to the net with quickness and finish. A DeBrusk/Krejci/Pasta line is a line with talent that will score goals, but won't possess the puck enough to keep the other team from scoring their fair share as well.

The reason why Cehlarik worked so well with Krejci and Pasta is he can absolutely take care of puck possession and make nice little passes and plays. Cehlarik is able to use his size and IQ in the offensive zone to help both Krejci and Pasta play their best games. The problem is that Cehlarik just isn't a great skater and between Cehlarik and Krejci you have effectively taken away Pastrnak's wheels 10 year early. Add to that, that while 46+88 have looked their best together while playing with Cehlarik, its not like Cehlarik himself has been able to act as more than a glue guy and actually put the puck in the net. If you are going to break up 63 and 88... the Krejci line better be scoring like a first line.

Honestly, the best person to play with Krejci and Pasta is a left handed version of Charlie Coyle that has a little more willingness to shoot the puck. Or a version of Sean Kuraly with some offensive IQ. Or a Cehlarik with speed. Or a DeBrusk that can slow down and protect the puck and create space. None of those players right now are the right player.

While in an ideal world you do spread the talent across the lineup, unless they get help from outside the organization, or unless Cehlarik makes a jump, you are breaking up a great 1st line (with no clear answer for RW in place) and you are putting together a 2nd line that don't cover their weaknesses well.

TLDR is that to break up 63/37/88, you need to get a LW that can cover 1, 2 and 3 above and that guy doesn't look to be on the roster.

2) If Pastrnak stays on the 1st line, who plays RW with Krejci?

First, I think that unless you bring in another LW from outside the organization, DeBrusk is your #2 LW. You can make the arguments about Kessel being on the 3rd line in Pittsburgh all you want, but the Bruins are short top 6 forward talent before you move DeBrusk down a line. The Bruins don't have Crosby and Malkin.

As outlined above, DeBrusk isn't the perfect linemate for Krejci. While Krejci is one of the best passers in the league, DeBrusk doesn't really do much to give him time and space to operate and nor does DeBrusk slow his game down that great. While DeBrusk can certainly be part of a Krejci line (Krejci does a very good job of getting the puck on DeBrusk's stick when DeBrusk has a path to the net) they need someone that can bridge the gap between them. Marchand makes Bergeron and Pasta work. The Krejci line needs someone that make DeBrusk and Krejci work. DeBrusk needs someone who can keep up on the rush + someone that can help with the possession game and Krejci needs another person who can help with creating time and space and working the cycle.

Coyle could be that guy. Someone who can control and puck and make space and give the skill guys room to operate. Of course, you then really mess up your 3rd line, and a lot of folks would grow to not like Coyle on a line with Krejci as Coyle is a guy who just doesn't shoot the puck enough.

Kuhlman has enough speed to keep up with DeBrusk, is tenacious on the forecheck and isn't afraid to shoot. He checks a lot of boxes in what you are looking for in completing that line. But, does he have top 6 talent? Seems like a big ask.

Senyshyn is along the same lines. Big and fast, but has his Providence training in "bottom 6 skills" put him in a position to use his natural talent and a rounded out game as a top 6 wing on a Cup contender? Seems like a big ask.

Back when Seguin was dealt, I would have thought Ritchie is someone that would have checked all the boxes as a RW for Krejci. Heck... maybe playing with Krejci and DeBrusk he can be physical and score 15-20 goals. Seems like a big ask.

Bjork probably fits well with DeBrusk, but not sure if Bjork+DeBrusk work great with Krejci. Those two wingers really need a different kind of center. Which brings us to the crux of the matter...

The Bruins are trying to build a team around skill on the wing and responsible possession guys up the middle and Krejci is out of that mold... but he is still a low end #1 to high end #2 C... and those don't grow on trees. So while Boston doesn't seem to be interested in getting another Oates, Janney, Savard, Allison, Barzal or Krejci pass first offensively focused skill guy at C, they have one now.

You can find a "RW for Krejci"... one that has size and puck control skills, but he has to be someone that is good enough to be in that role in a post-Krejci world. Finding some modern day Lucic or Horton that can skate and be worth the cost after Krejci is gone... but that you can fit under the cap and are able to acquire seems like an impossible list. Mark Stone certainly checked a lot of boxes, but the Bruins really could put together a package to match Vegas realistically, nor do they have the cap space right now. And, more importantly, at what point to you decide that "finding a center for DeBrusk and Pasta" starts making more sense than finding a winger for Krejci?

3) Who fits with Coyle and Heinen?

Speed. Senyshyn, Bjork, Kuhlman. All those guys fit the bill. Not worried.

So I guess after all that you are left with a few options.

1) Stay the course

Let Kuhlman, Senyshyn, Ritchie and Bjork fight over the two middle 6 RW spots and go deadline shopping again for a rental. Maybe Studnicka or Frederic force Coyle up to #2RW.

This seems most likely. I feel very confident in one of those guys sticking on the 3rd line and like the chemistry potential.

Marchand Bergeron Pastrnak
DeBrusk Krejci Kuhlman/Senyshyn/Ritchie
Heinen Coyle Kuhlman/Senyshyn/Bjork

Frolik, Toffoli, Hoffman, etc become names we talk about in the spring to play RW with Krejci.

This is actually the most simple plan and the one that makes the most sense. But it's not very fun.

2) Give Cehlarik a shot

Marchand Bergeron Heinen
Cehlarik Krejci Pastrnak
DeBrusk Coyle Kuhlman/Senyshyn/Bjork

I like 63/37/43 as a two way line. A lot. But, it only works if the Krejci line can be a real #1 line offensively. Cehlarik will have had to had some kind of offseason to be a REAL top 6 player. Love the third line, but I love the third line with Heinen, too.

3) Go get someone signed long term at RW

Someone that can bridge Krejci+DeBrusk and keep the first line as is.

This has been the desired path for a long time, but I think it might be too late to find a guy that will work with DeBrusk and Krejci and also DeBrusk and Krejci's replacement we hope is Studnicka but don't know. I just don't know who this guy is. And I don't know how you afford his salary. And I don't know how you trade for him.

4) Go get a LW that can bridge Krejci+Pasta

And move DeBrusk to 3rd line.

This honestly would be more of a move planning for the post-Krejci world. A LW that can bridge between Krejci+Pasta likely has the skill set to be there when Studnicka or Coyle or whomever is going to be there. Kreider and Hall are the most obvious names. Names that would require moving on from Krejci after the season and would make DeBrusk a "luxury" on the 3rd line. This would be the most drastic move.

Credit where it`s due, likely the most well thought out and rational post which offers fellow fans some very interesting things to think about.

This is a camp coming where I think it`ll be completely incumbent on the players themselves to dictate where they wind up playing.

Personally, I leave the Bergy line completely alone, perfect world scenario and not banking on it but Ritchie would rediscover the game that helped him pop 15-16 goals a few years back alongside of DK. The B`s just haven`t been able to find a full time big bodied player who can play top 6 minutes to play with DK for years now. Again, I`m not expecting it but man would it be a huge luxury to have if Ritchie shows he`s comfortable playing in that role.

I`m really intrigued about reading the reports on the battle for a few other spots, Bjork/Seny/Cehlarik/Kuhlman all likely in the running for a spot, Kuhlman might have the inside track based on solid if unspectacular play last year. Really pulling for Bjork, you can just see the skill oozing from him, gotta keep that head up though kid. I`m also pulling for Seny, torn between me wanting this because I believe he can be a player who`s game would be more valuable at the NHL level than the AHL level or if I just wanna read all the naysayers disappear:laugh:
 

Rubber Biscuit

Registered User
Sep 9, 2010
13,753
8,279
Long Island
Kuhlman was (somehow quietly) the team's most effective player this past season. I don't need you to believe me -- I trust my math. I very strongly advocate for a proper trial for Kuhlman in Pastrnak's old spot. the preseason and first month or so should be exciting as a lot of young guys press for spots. I hold a lot of hope for Cehlarik, a dude who was also extremely effective in all of his chances until his most recent one, which was bad enough to sink his outlier status into the average second-liner territory, which is probably his real role to shine from, which I expect again. I think Kuhlman has made his linemates so much better that a bad week for him would not dip him below anybody else on the roster as far as being a game-changing positive influence. Clifton comes the closest to such a status among the defensemen. that defensive right side is perfect if Miller stays on as the substitute. I am excited for the lineups to take shape. this is a top-tier team.

Jesus this is one outrageous take. I imagine if you ever explained your nonsense rankings we'd all see very clearly just how little sense they make. But you know that, otherwise you'd have no issue laying it all out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The National

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
8,865
10,085
that's fine. I have high hopes for Bjork, too. this is going to be a fun start to the season. think anybody displaces Grzelcyk?
Aren't Moore and Miller unavailable to start the season? Or potentially?

They're going to need Gryz. I dont see Vaak/Lauzon/Zboril taking his seat.
 

Donnie Shulzhoffer

Rocket Surgery
Sep 9, 2008
15,816
11,436
Foxboro, MA
Kuhlman was (somehow quietly) the team's most effective player this past season. I don't need you to believe me -- I trust my math. I very strongly advocate for a proper trial for Kuhlman in Pastrnak's old spot. the preseason and first month or so should be exciting as a lot of young guys press for spots. I hold a lot of hope for Cehlarik, a dude who was also extremely effective in all of his chances until his most recent one, which was bad enough to sink his outlier status into the average second-liner territory, which is probably his real role to shine from, which I expect again. I think Kuhlman has made his linemates so much better that a bad week for him would not dip him below anybody else on the roster as far as being a game-changing positive influence. Clifton comes the closest to such a status among the defensemen. that defensive right side is perfect if Miller stays on as the substitute. I am excited for the lineups to take shape. this is a top-tier team.

Using that new math?
 
  • Like
Reactions: The National

Riverfront

Registered User
Jan 5, 2015
1,081
508
i think the bruins can find the top 6 RW via the trade market but it will surely cost them krug. If they are willing there are trade options
out there with other teams who desperately are looking for top 4 defensemen . The bruins seem much deeper on the blueline then up
front so Sweeney and company will have a decision to make with that regard.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,118
20,931
Tyler, TX
that's fine. I have high hopes for Bjork, too. this is going to be a fun start to the season. think anybody displaces Grzelcyk?

Not a chance. In fact, I look for him to play more minutes as Chara should see some reduction in ice time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estlin

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad