Byram should have went 1st OA in his draft year, just like Makar should have. Byram could be just as good as Makar.
Love Byram, but that’s expecting a little much. Makar has the highest ceiling of any D in hockey if you ask me. His raw ability is next to none.
You're not wrong but Byram is slightly ahead of Makar at the same age/development.
You're not wrong but Byram is slightly ahead of Makar at the same age/development.
So I was reading an article about potential current players that could be Hall-of-Famers once they retire and on that list they included Steven Stamkos. Now I think Stamkos is a talented player, but I just don't get the love with him in all honesty? Do you lot think I am underrating him because I believe he has to be one of the most overrated players in the league in how fans and rival fans view him compared to his talent level? I think a big issue for me why I consider him supremely overvalued is that he's constantly injured, though albeit by a couple of fluke injuries. However, still he's missed a quite a lot of games over the past five years.
First of all, I'm talking out of my ass. Now second, the totals are similar and even in Gonchar's favor, but I don't see those two in the same light. Probably mostly because of seeing Gonchar play later and more recently but still. Zubov to me is a star (Dallas Star, eh?), while Gonchar is Tomas Kaberle.
Also, what the f*** was up with Zub that Rangers Cup year?
That is a very short offseason #2
Do we even know when the hell the draft is going to take place?
You're not wrong but Byram is slightly ahead of Makar at the same age/development.
I'm not placing any expectations on the two here, but can you imagine we had MacKinnon and a legit Norris level first pair. The kind that effortlessly plays 30 minutes and doesn't f*** up. I can only get so hard.I personally disagree, but it's close. In any case, I just think Makar always had the highest ceiling, and that's not a knock on Byram at all. I still wholeheartedly believe that Byram has every tool needed to become a #1 D in the NHL. I think the Avs have a real chance at having two legit 1D's, and the best pair in the NHL.
I was cautiously optimistic about Makar after his D+1 season and feel the same with Byram. But it’ll be virtually impossible for Byram to be as good or close to Makar.Love Byram, but that’s expecting a little much. Makar has the highest ceiling of any D in hockey if you ask me. His raw ability is next to none.
I'm not placing any expectations on the two here, but can you imagine we had MacKinnon and a legit Norris level first pair. The kind that effortlessly plays 30 minutes and doesn't f*** up. I can only get so hard.
Yeah, I know that.I think come playoff time in their prime, Makar/Byram/Girard will be eating major minutes, but there aren’t many guys these days that that log a lot of ice-time.
Maybe just a change in the game these days, but only 4, or 5 guys in the league play 25 minutes a night.
Yeah, I know that.
All I ask is that they become Chris Pronger and Al MacInnis in 1999, now what's so difficult to understand about that?