The only two stats that matter for an attacker, goals and assists. Why is this so hard to understand?
Yes, it is a serious question. If you are using an extremely small sample size of games, it really doesn't matter whether the good performances come against the good or bad teams. What matters is the full performance at the end of the season. You can't pick and choose what matters. You seem to want to do a lot of this. Certain stats, certain games. It doesn't work that way, in my opinion. If the full picture isn't good, it doesn't matter whether you can cherry pick one pixel of the picture as a good thing.
You've quoted me a few times in this discussion, but you didn't quote exactly what I stated with that comment, and deliberately distorted the context. Thats dishonest. Unless you are dumb, you should be aware of the difference between the context behind what I meant and what you claimed I meant.
What's so hard to understand is that you said that I didn't take all of his stats into account and that you did when in actuality I'm the one who actually posted his goals and assists. And no, goals and assists aren't the only two stat that matter for an attacker. That's another ridiculous statement.
Newsflash, the season isn't over yet! How would I use his full season performance when the season isn't over yet? Oh yeah, I can't. As for picking and choosing what matters, that's an incredibly stupid comment for you to make. In the same post as I'm quoting you saying that you are also saying "the only two stats that matter for an attacker, goals and assists", which again you didn't bring to the table in the first place. That's not to mention the whole story that some of us combined have presented compared to the very little you've presented. You're either incredibly hypocritical, incredibly stupid, or both.
Nonsense. Absolute nonsense. What's more, you still can't clearly state (or more likely won't, and I don't blame you) how I misrepresented you or deliberately distorted the context. As for what you meant, go ahead and clarify for whatever it is you're referring to.
You can post whatever you want, but your posts have been shockingly poor from the moment you commented on Traore by saying he "isn't actually good" and "he's talked about because he's strong. That's about it." That is an awful take and you've offered virtually nothing to back that up.