I would make that trade in a heartbeat. I doubt Florida would though. They’re super high on Barkov.If we got the 1st OA, would you trade it straight up for Barkov? I might. He’d be perfect between Aho and TT.
I would make that trade in a heartbeat. I doubt Florida would though. They’re super high on Barkov.If we got the 1st OA, would you trade it straight up for Barkov? I might. He’d be perfect between Aho and TT.
Yeah I would guess it would take quite a bit more than just the first overall. Probably too much for it to be worthwhile.I would make that trade in a heartbeat. I doubt Florida would though. They’re super high on Barkov.
The emergence of Barzal has me hoping for a trend that I’ve desperately missed in the NHL. The ridiculously skilled 5’10-6’0 185 lb medium sized true number one center. In the early 90’s almost everyone had one. Sakic, Yzerman, Lafontaine, Turgeon, Oates, Roenick, Janney, Gilmour, Damphousse etc...
Barzal reminds me of that type of player. They became undersized and everyone started wanting the big power center. Dilution of talent due to expansion and increased speed/fitness has meant teams need all the skill they can get and smaller players have obviously made a comeback. A new generation of speedy, dangly, playmakering centers who can also score would be sweet.
This is somewhat of a devil's advocate position, but:
Given the possibility that Dahlin disappoints, and/or the likelihood that he has a 5+ year development curve to get to his "franchise player" potential... would we be better off trading that pick for someone whose prime years would track more closely with our current group? It would resolve the LHD-overload issue without having to find a buyer for Hanifin, and it would likely give us a better return than Hanifin would under such distressed circumstances. We wouldn't end up in a situation where we're trading players just to make room, or end up with Dahlin emerging just as Skinner/Staal are hitting the end-of-career skids and Aho is past his best seasons.
Just a thought.
Did we just unjinx our own jinx with this tread? Quick, someone unjinx my post!
Did you forget how this works? We will beat playoff teams in March and then lose to the Arizonas and Ottawas of the world to stay behind the pace we need.Did we just unjinx our own jinx with this tread? Quick, someone unjinx my post!
How much consideration do you think RF has given the scenario of trading the No. 1 overall pick? As much as I like the idea, he'd dismiss it before you even got your whole thought out.
I mean, while it never or rarely happens, I'd either trade the pick or make the pick and work a deal with one of our blueliners as the centerpiece. Dahlin is supposedly such a talent, it would be hard to pass on him, but you might be able to then move Hanifin or some such, assuming Dahlin is indeed a generational talent. You might also be able to swing a deal with somebody like Buffalo....a bigger deal around swapping picks, adding assets and getting ROR. That's the type of deal I'd look into. The other team I'd chat with would be Colorado. They've got Ottawa's 1st and right now that looks to be #3. Anyway it's all speculation and fantasy regardless....but ending up with a Top 3 pick and a scoring forward wouldn't be the worst outcome.If we get 1OA, we'd better be trading it.
Francis' draft strategy has been "need and lack of concern for consensus thought in favor of our own scouting."
If we have and keep 1OA...he's not taking Dahlin. I'm certain of it.
NotOpie, that Ottawa pick is essentially a choice for Ottawa, either 2018 or 2019. The statement was “2018 top 10 protected, if so, moves to 2019” but from what I’ve read it’s really the Sens’ choice. They can give this year’s or next year’s.I mean, while it never or rarely happens, I'd either trade the pick or make the pick and work a deal with one of our blueliners as the centerpiece. Dahlin is supposedly such a talent, it would be hard to pass on him, but you might be able to then move Hanifin or some such, assuming Dahlin is indeed a generational talent. You might also be able to swing a deal with somebody like Buffalo....a bigger deal around swapping picks, adding assets and getting ROR. That's the type of deal I'd look into. The other team I'd chat with would be Colorado. They've got Ottawa's 1st and right now that looks to be #3. Anyway it's all speculation and fantasy regardless....but ending up with a Top 3 pick and a scoring forward wouldn't be the worst outcome.
Crazy coaches. They've done similar things before with young stars.What was the scuttlebutt re. Dahlin being scratched throughout the Olympics?
I mean, while it never or rarely happens, I'd either trade the pick or make the pick and work a deal with one of our blueliners as the centerpiece. Dahlin is supposedly such a talent, it would be hard to pass on him, but you might be able to then move Hanifin or some such, assuming Dahlin is indeed a generational talent. You might also be able to swing a deal with somebody like Buffalo....a bigger deal around swapping picks, adding assets and getting ROR. That's the type of deal I'd look into. The other team I'd chat with would be Colorado. They've got Ottawa's 1st and right now that looks to be #3. Anyway it's all speculation and fantasy regardless....but ending up with a Top 3 pick and a scoring forward wouldn't be the worst outcome.
I'd forgotten about the Ottawa qualification(s)....anyway, I'm of the mind that ROR would be a good fit here and it would make the team that much more difficult to play against while adding some set of increased point production.
I’m mentally preparing myself for the lottery going to Edmonton, New York, and New York. It’s gonna happen.Please hockey Gods have mercy on our pathetic franchise and its long suffering fans. Hear our pleas. Let us win one of the lotteries.
In that case fold NHL as a league and make a new oneI’m mentally preparing myself for the lottery going to Edmonton, New York, and New York. It’s gonna happen.