- Nov 17, 2016
- 3,102
- 2,893
It's weird to talk about a player no one really knows about and who might end up a 2nd anyway, but I guess I'll more bluntly say: would you rather do a general trade down (for JBD or Lundkvist or whoever) than take Berggren or Kaut at #19? How much would you value a top 4 RHD?
I wouldn't bet on it either. But I wouldn't totally outrule the possibility; we've seen people fall from Bob's rankings plenty, accurate as they are. A Russian falling is hardly new. 14 is close enough too. But even if Kravtsov, for example, fell out of that top 12, Dallas sure seems a possibility, unless they got gun shy after their last two Russian picks.
It only would take a couple teams is my point. But part of my issue is I'm not entirely sure who would sneak in. Mark Edwards basically threw cold water on people's Veleno fantasies. I think Farabee could sneak in, but that doesn't do us much good either probably. And even if he doesn't perhaps he goes #13. Smith? Kaut? Not impossible, but I'm uncertain who would bump someone out. There does seem to be a similar-ish herd of players after that "top 12," without too many standouts, at least in a consensus manner of speaking. A lot of players could go at a lot of spots.
Would absolutely trade up for Wahlstrom.
Depends on so many factors. Where does he fall? Who else is available? What is the price?
To be honest, I'm not Bouchard's biggest fan. But I wouldn't be upset if Hextall traded up to #8-10, because someone has to slip.
Dahlin
Svechnikov
Zadina
Tkachuk
Hughes
Dobson
Bouchard
Kotkaniemi
Wahlstrom
Boqvist
At least one of these guys has to fall to #10. I think it will be Boqvist or Bouchard, but again, someone has to fall to #10, and the price to get to that position shouldn't be astronomical.
My opinion is definitely subject to change, but right now I think I want Hextall to just stay at #14 and #19.
He said the kid ended up going 30th so my first thought was Merkley who was grouped with Konecny. But Bob also said the trade happened on the draft floor and Lucic was traded prior to the draft.So I listened to this. I think he intimated Konecny had a promise from the Kings and would have gone 13, but they changed their minds and opted for immediate help in Lucic.
Also, I would not bet on Kravtsov being an option at 14.
I mentioned this a couple months ago but he was literally playing 30+ minutes a night in the regular season which obviously helped his production but kids that play that much at that level will tend to take shortcuts to preserve energy and that often comes in the D zone.Wow! Great video and thank you for sharing.
I hadn't watched a ton of Bouchard, since he is unlikely to fall to the Flyers' range, and most of what I had seen just focused on his offense, not his defense, which can be a problem in using video to scout defensemen.
He definitely has offensive skill and intelligence, but I absolutely HATE what I see in this video. I mean, utterly despise it, and I'm extremely glad I was able to watch it. Utterly lazy, lackadaisical defense, both technique-wise and effort-wise. And repeatedly so.
He reads the ice well offensively, but he sure doesn't have the same knack on the other side of the puck.
Forget the Flyers drafting him. And he's definitely getting knocked down on my list.
Hughes is my dream pick.
If Hughes for some reason dropped to #9-10 and the price wasn't crazy, I'd take him in a heartbeat. Guy is a magician!
Me too. Somehow pulling off Hughes+Farabee would make my head explode.
He said the kid ended up going 30th so my first thought was Merkley who was grouped with Konecny. But Bob also said the trade happened on the draft floor and Lucic was traded prior to the draft. .
I mentioned this a couple months ago but he was literally playing 30+ minutes a night in the regular season which obviously helped his production but kids that play that much at that level will tend to take shortcuts to preserve energy and that often comes in the D zone.
Fine with me. Let the hype train go out of control on Hayton.I was all set fire Hexy to take Hayton at 14 and disappoint the board, and now I hear he’s going top 10 maybe top 5.
Hughes is my dream pick.
If Hughes for some reason dropped to #9-10 and the price wasn't crazy, I'd take him in a heartbeat. Guy is a magician!
Though if we traded up to #10 with #14+ something else that isn't 19. And grabbed Hughes, and got Berggren with #19...
Right. To be clear, I only meant given my general impression of his chances of being available at 14 are lower than they were before the podcast. It's always going to be volatile projecting a player like Kravtsov by nature, but I expected his spikes to be in the 7-10 range, not top 5. That opens up some possibilities I hadn't considered. I drew more from that than there being a top 12.
As for who would bump someone, Smith and Kaut do make sense. I would also look toward the Centers and Miller. If Hayton is going early and Veleno isn't thought of in that way, all hell could break loose.
Yeah, Bouchard played an obscene amount of minutes, like 30 minutes a night easy. No one I watched played more, even #1s like Smith and Dobson. Especially by that end of year footage linked, which seemed a low-lites compilation. I've been pretty consistent saying I'm not as high on Bouchard as most, but I watched half the video, and I've seen better from Bouchard. He's a smart player and usually in position. It definitely looks like he's conserving a little energy and being lazy. They need him to score anyway. That said, even at his best he's an incredibly safe, containment, passive defender. I don't like that about him. And even at his best he can be a little low urgency. Button compared him to John Carlson, and I just think that's a a real good comparison, flaws and strengths.
Thats exactly my thinking. But if so many NHL scouts have him ranked that high I doubt this is a regular game for him.It's pretty scary that all those Bouchard shifts occurred in the same solitary playoff game. He played an absolute garbage game defensively. Maybe it's unfair to get so much of a bad feel out of one game in the playoffs, but it's not the physical errors that bother me, it's the sheer number of lazy, unthinking, zero-intensity defensive plays and reads that are scary as hell if you're going to spend a top 10 pick on this guy. He's their captain playing like that? In a playoff game? Looked like he had no interest in being there other than to get on the scoresheet. There's zero chance I'd draft this guy. If I'm being too harsh on him because of one game and end up wrong, so be it, but there's no way I'd risk a top 10 pick finding out.
You wouldn't think so. And he has good size, eye popping stats, a RH shot, and is undoubtedly a very good passer from the previous videos I've seen. But maybe those things are blinding scouts to his weaknesses. Wouldn't be the first time.Thats exactly my thinking. But if so many NHL scouts have him ranked that high I doubt this is a regular game for him.
It's pretty scary that all those Bouchard shifts occurred in the same solitary playoff game. He played an absolute garbage game defensively. Maybe it's unfair to get so much of a bad feel out of one game in the playoffs, but it's not the physical errors that bother me, it's the sheer number of lazy, unthinking, zero-intensity defensive plays and reads that are scary as hell if you're going to spend a top 10 pick on this guy. He's their captain playing like that? In a playoff game? Looked like he had no interest in being there other than to get on the scoresheet. There's zero chance I'd draft this guy. If I'm being too harsh on him because of one game and end up wrong, so be it, but there's no way I'd risk a top 10 pick finding out.