If they decide to be sellers, they would be really dumb to keep Harper. I find it very unlikely he would want to stick with the Nats after they declare themselves sellers.
Why? Not saying harper wont leave but lets not act like the nats wont be able to compete next year. They still gonna have rendon, Turner, eaton, zimmerman, scherzer, Strasburg, roark, doolittle etc. Plus the emergence of juan soto plus victor robles
Now will that keep harper in dc, who knows but the nats have the offense to keep going next year with or without harper
Why? Not saying harper wont leave but lets not act like the nats wont be able to compete next year. They still gonna have rendon, Turner, eaton, zimmerman, scherzer, Strasburg, roark, doolittle etc. Plus the emergence of juan soto plus victor robles
Now will that keep harper in dc, who knows but the nats have the offense to keep going next year with or without harper
Zero championships and the team sells in his contract year? Not to mention that he’s going to pick a team that will offer huge term. I just don’t see him staying.
I think he'll stay as long as the Nats put in an offer that's very competitive with the best offer he gets (assuming some other team puts in a better off than them). But there are several baseball cities where he can be the man and have playoff success too, and some of those teams will probably offer him obscene money.You could be right, i just dont see many players turning down the opportunity to be "the man" in a baseball city