If true, remember I called it first!So its happening? Simmonds ++
I would love it but hate seeing Simmer in our division. If he was traded i wanted him out west.If true, remember I called it first!
@BrindamoursNose you were correct
Enstrom could be a low-key solid addition. At least that what pdocast said.If he moves Simmonds, I'm not even hung up anymore on it HAVING to be a RHD cause we all know how though that is gonna be.
I'll take a legit Top 4 LHD who's similarly aged if he's out there to be had for Wayne.
edit: 20 teams?!
Get out of here. Manning is/was terrible here. He’s a 6/7 guy on any strong team.I still think Manning would look better on D than either Hagg or AMac. Oh well, hope he signs with a decent team in the next few days.
Quoting myself. But Panarin is a LW. Where would he be playing? If we traded for him?**** we gonna do a Wayne Simmonds for Panarin deal aren’t we?
Quoting myself. But Panarin is a LW. Where would he be playing? If we traded for him?
Dreger reporter we were one of the teams after him. I don’t think Giroux goes back to center.I'm not sure they are in on Panarin, and if they were, I'm not sure where he goes too, history dictates he's a #1 LW, right? Giroux was pretty damn good there, and now you have JVR. Do you put G back at C with Panarin and TK?
Dreger reporter we were one of the teams after him. I don’t think Giroux goes back to center.
A deal around Simmonds and Panarin makes sense if Columbus can’t sign him. They could probably sign Simmonds to what he would be looking for.
I thought Dreger said Philly "makes sense". I read that differently then "In on him"
Yea, he says they make sense. Unless that's code for calling on price.