Hobble
Registered User
- Sep 2, 2010
- 8,155
- 7,397
Yes, they are great. Hovewer, I checked their 5-on-5 statistics of following combinations:
ESW + CSW + PSW (listed as "Scheifele w Wheeler")
ESL + PSL (listed as "Scheifele w Laine")
with following results:
Mind you, most of those "Scheifele w Laine" are from Laine's rookie season as a 18-year-old when Jets was quite bad in general, and most of those "Scheifel w Wheeler" are from last season when Jets was about to take the President's Trophy, but didn't quite manage to do that.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
TOI (min) GF GF/60 GA GA/60 GDiff GF% Scheifele w Wheeler 1163.44 55 2.84 50 2.58 5 52,38 % Scheifele w Laine 401.49 33 4.93 21 3.14 12 61,11 %
Seems that Scheifele + Rookie Laine had a bit higher GA/60, but really significantly higher GF/60 as well, and therefore much, much better GF%. In other words, given the same amount of TOI had they continued to be as effective, Scheifele w Laine would have made about +35 goal differential instead of that +5 goal differential Scheifele was able to do with Wheeler with same other wingers (apart from Connor, that never played with Scheifele & Laine).
It's not debatable whether 1150 min sample size is big enough. It's huge. Sample size of 400 min is also substantial. These statistics greatly favor trying Laine with Scheifele again, and pretty soon. Obviously Maurice sheltered Laine much more than he shelters Wheeler, as Maurice shelters Wheeler only with Lowry line whereas he shelters Laine with both Lowry line and Scheifele line. However, the opponent tries to target your best offensive forces, and you can't control that. And therefore playing field is much more even that it may sound in the first place.
Those special minutes Scheifele played with Wheeler and Stastny protecting the lead are not shown in above statistics.
Conclusion:
Statistically duo Scheifele + Laine with either Ehlers or Perreault as the other winger has been 74% MORE productive than duo Scheifele + Wheeler with either Ehlers, Perreault or Connor as the other winger. When considering 22% WORSE defence though, the net effectivenes for winning of ScheifLaine duo vs. MarkWheeler was "only" roughly 600% better (+35 vs +5) ;-)
Well. Just a couple more goals for MarkWheeler, and that 600% is no more as the divider is so small, but you got the idea. In all seriousness it's better to compare just GF/60, GA/60 and GF% to get the idea of what works and what doesn't.
(Waiting for Corsi army to invade the thread in any time, but Jim Corsi doesn't score you any goals and it cannot be used to measure past success or to compare different players on isolation, only for individual trends.)
EDIT: Adding one of the greatest combinations of NHL currently as a comparison:
They are absolutely superb at defending letting only just a bit over 2 GA/60. However, their offence could be better as it's only a bit better than MarkWheeler, but doesn't even dream off the levels of ScheifLaine, even when considering that that Bergeron line is pretty much the "Lowry-line" in terms of shutting down the deadliest opposing lines, such as they did for Matthews in the playofs, AFAIK.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Season Team GP TOI GF GF/60 GA GA/60 G+/- Gdiff/60 GF% MARCHAND PASTRNAK BERGERON 2016-2018 BOS 117 1042,78 53 3,05 36 2,07 17 0,98 59,55
Numbers would suggest Laine+Scheif to be the best combo to try.
Also, the fact that Wheeler is nearing the end of his contract, and even with a new contract, the Jets will hopefully have Scheif and Laine on the team much longer. I think it would make sense to have your two young and powerhouse players together and building chemistry for as long as possible. Wheeler and Little have played together before (+/- Ladd), so they obviously know how to play off each other.