Ban Hammered
Disallowed & Inhibited
- May 15, 2003
- 7,045
- 950
In a reversal argument, if the big three had rink sizes like that of the majority of college hockey they would be at 100% capacity every single game.Makes sense considering no one else has capacities that big.
% of full would be a much better indicator than per game numbers.
In a reversal argument, if the big three had rink sizes like that of the majority of college hockey they would be at 100% capacity every single game.
And Ohio State has the biggest rink in college hockey by a rather significant margin (almost 2,200 more seats than the Kohl Center, the second biggest rink).
Makes sense considering no one else has capacities that big.
% of full would be a much better indicator than per game numbers.
You don't think 100% of 5K would be a better indicator of support than 50% of 10K?Would only really be a better indicator for the schools that draw 100% in their small rinks and even then it probably wouldn't be a great indicator.
Is it fair for teams that use larger multi-purpose buildings? What about 100% of 5k vs 70% of 15k (i.e. 5,000 vs 10,500)? Do you think it'd be hard for Minnesota/Wisconsin/North Dakota to fill a 5k barn like Michigan's? I don't think one can argue that the three largest support/fan bases in college hockey are those three teams. When I had season tickets to Badger hockey they were at 94% capacity for the entire season, an overall number that almost TRIPLES the 5,000 at 100%. That's 14,430 fans per game at the Kohl Center. I could think of two fanbases that could come close to that number (well, if Minnesota were to ever get their heads out of their asses in regards to ticket prices), the rest would never get near that number even if they had the barn to fit them all.You don't think 100% of 5K would be a better indicator of support than 50% of 10K?
You don't think 100% of 5K would be a better indicator of support than 50% of 10K?
That would be nice. 8 teams would almost make it like a real conference.Apparently Illinois is close to adding hockey program - would be 8th Big10 team
Seems like they don’t want to travel to Alaska and Alabama.
Because doing that costs a lot of money.Seems like they don’t want to travel to Alaska and Alabama.
Anything involving Alaska or Hawaii for college sports will always make me scratch my head. I understand that they shouldn't be left out of the college sports world because they are not connected to the mainland, but I wonder how much of the bill they pick up if any for opposing teams travelling.Because doing that costs a lot of money.
I know in hockey, if you travel to play either of the Alaska teams, the NCAA allows you to add a home game to your schedule.Anything involving Alaska or Hawaii for college sports will always make me scratch my head. I understand that they shouldn't be left out of the college sports world because they are not connected to the mainland, but I wonder how much of the bill they pick up if any for opposing teams travelling.
That would be nice. 8 teams would almost make it like a real conference.