UticaHockey
Registered User
There was no real reason to make the Nilsson trade when they did other than some self created pressure to call up Demko after the first of the year. And then after that self created pressure Demko only gets into a single game in a months time before injuring himself in warm ups for a game that he wasn't even scheduled to play in.Going forward nothing is certain in life so we couldn't have known that Markstrom would play well and Demko would be hurt, but they are hardly surprising.
1. The Nilsson trade was made January 2.
In the month preceding the trade Markstrom had a .943 save % and a goals against average of 1.62.
From January 2 to February 4 Markstrom had a .912 save percentage and a 2.67 goals against average.
Demko's getting into only one game up to the time he was hurt can hardly be attributed to Markstrom being surprisingly good. The hot streak Markstrom was on before the trade has cooled off and his play has been that of a capable NHL starter behind a team that was giving up a lot of scoring chances.
2. An NHL player getting injured is never surprising. It is expected and, in places other than Vancouver, planned for.
With Bachman out for the season Benning made a trade for a depth goalie that required clearing waivers to bring Demko up knowing full well that there was not another NHL contracted goalie available in the AHL if McKenna gets claimed. Why was there such a rush to make this trade happen. If they insisted on having Ottawa pass McKenna through waivers first then the risk of not having an NHL depth goalie in the minors is eliminated. If Ottawa doesn't agree to these terms then walk away and continue to look for another team that may have a goalie need before the deadline.
There was no real reason why Demko had to be called up (and not played) when he was. Even if Nilsson didn't get traded they still could have called Demko up after the trade deadline when rosters are expanded and give him as many starts as they want to see what they have in him for next season.