Foppa Frossa
Registered User
Bowers is on the list.He isn't on the list now so I don't think he will be invited
Bowers is on the list.He isn't on the list now so I don't think he will be invited
Makar magic.
I don't think people gave UMass enough credit last year... Carvel has brought in a top of talent and last year they were very talented, but raw and inexperienced. This year you are seeing the experience come around to the talent. Mitchell Chaffee should have been drafted last year and might be a coveted free agent this spring if he wants to leave. Marc Del Gaizo will also peak interest in couple seasons.
Bowers is on the list.
Sounds like Makar's development, along with that of his team-mates has really contributed to his offensive dominance. They seem to be making much better use of what he creates on the ice this year. I've only watched a couple of games myself, but they seemed like a much more mature and structured team this year in the way they play from start to finish. Makar was ice-man level consistent throughout the games that I watched as well.
I wouldn't say they are more structured...they were very structured last year, they were a bit snakebit last year and had some classic inexperience blunders. Bad turnovers, bad penalties, too quick to defer. This year the whole group is more confident and are stepping on the ice thinking they will win every game. Makar stirs the drink, but Chaffee and Leonard are the gin and tonic. Those two are very good players and I don't think they get nearly the credit they should to how good UMass can be. Marc is also a very big part of the team... his ability to create has taken some of that burden off Makar and teams less ability to key in on Makar.
Maybe when I say structured it probably is a bit more of a lose term than it would be for you. They seem more consistent in how they play from period to period, and their transitions seemed more controlled and consistent. Basically just to say that there are obvious signs of maturity throughout the team. Even from a novice perspective.
You should use Klim Kostin as a benchmarker since he went straight into the AHL after his draft year. Even though he was picked 31st overall*, he did post 28 points in 66 games as an 18-year-old rookie (which I consider it a successful season). Thus far Kaut has 11 in 21 games which you can say is exceeding expectations for me.Martin Kaut has 11 points in 21 games. The Wolves don’t seem to have a lot of high end performers or am I misinterpreting something?
What’s expected of him? Is he underperforming? Is it the talent around him?
You should use Klim Kostin as a benchmarker since he went straight into the AHL after his draft year. Even though he was picked 31st overall*, he did post 28 points in 66 games as an 18-year-old rookie (which I consider it a successful season). Thus far Kaut has 11 in 21 games which you can say is exceeding expectations for me.
* He was ranked higher throughout the season, but sustained a shoulder injury in his draft year.
Numbers aren't really coming, but it is a new coach in a new system and he's centring the top line playing against the best players constantly. Perhaps he's snakebitten a tad, but there is also a reason why he went in the twentys instead of the top 15.Are the numbers starting to come for Bowers? Is his development still progressing well? Outside shot at team Canada?