Prospect Info: 2018-19 Prospects Thread (CHL, NCAA, Junior A, Europe)

Status
Not open for further replies.

McMetal

Writer of Wrongs
Sep 29, 2015
14,182
12,281
The results of the prospect ranking polls are in!

PositionPlayerDraft2018 Rank2017 RankChange
RDCale Makar2017 #41 (100%)10
RWMartin Kaut2018 #162 (49.1%)--
RDConor Timmins2017 #323 (70.8%)7+4
CShane Bowers2017 #28 (TR)4 (76.1%)--
RDNicolas Meloche2015 #405 (61%)4-1
CVladislav Kamenev2014 #42 (TR)6 (72.1%)--
CIgor Shvyrev2017 #1257 (65.2%)10+3
LWAJ Greer2015 #398 (71.6%)6-2
LWTy LewisUndrafted9 (28%)--
LWTyler Weiss2018 #10910 (29.2%)--
LWSampo Ranta2018 #7811 (32.9%)--
GJustus Annunen2018 #6412 (40.3%)--
RWNikolai Kovalenko2018 #17113 (35.5%)--
LWCam Morrison2016 #4014 (47.5%)11-3
CJC Beaudin2015 #7115 (60%)9-6
RWNick Henry2017 #9416 (58.6%)15-1
LDDanila Zhuravlyov2018 #15617 (27.3%)--
LDNick Leivermann2017 #18718 (32%)25+7
LWDenis Smirnov2017 #15619 (53.7%)17-2
LWTravis Barron2016 #19120 (22.7%)24+4
CJosh DickinsonUndrafted21 (29.8%)--
CBrandon Saigeon2018 #14022 (28.3%)--
LDSergei Boikov2015 #16123 (31.3%)19-4
LDJosh Anderson2016 #7124 (29.5%)22-2
GAdam Werner2016 #13125 (43.9%)NR+1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
HONORABLE MENTIONS

PositionPlayerDraft2018 Rank2017 Rank
GSpencer Martin2013 #63HM12
RDNathan Clurman2016 #161HM18
GShamil Shmakov2018 #202HM-
GPetr Kvaca2017 #114HM23
RWLogan O'ConnorUndraftedHM-
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 
Last edited:

S E P H

Cloud IX
Mar 5, 2010
31,058
16,585
Toruń, PL
Do we need somebody to do the prospect ranking polls this summer now that TV is gone? If so, I can take a crack at it.
Once we're done, update your post with the rankings so it will make it easier to find if anybody like myself would want to come back to it!:nod:
 
  • Like
Reactions: McMetal

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
45,266
42,933
Caverns of Draconis
Very curious to how this list will play out this year...


My early crack at the Top 10 is probably something like....


1. Cale Makar
2. Connor Timmins
3. Shane Bowers
4. #16 Pick
5. Nicolas Meloche
6. Vladislav Kamenev
7. AJ Greer
8.#47 Pick
9. Cam Morrison
10. #58 Pick
 

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,453
7,605
Very curious to how this list will play out this year...


My early crack at the Top 10 is probably something like....


1. Cale Makar
2. Connor Timmins
3. Shane Bowers
4. #16 Pick
5. Nicolas Meloche
6. Vladislav Kamenev
7. AJ Greer
8.#47 Pick
9. Cam Morrison
10. #58 Pick
Mr and Mrs Pick are weird people. Who in their right mind would name their kids #16, #47 and #58? These guys must be triplets then.
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,554
19,390
w/ Renly's Peach
Top 4 / Top 6 guys:
Makar
#16
Timmins
Meloche
Shvyryov

Middle 6 / Top 9 guys:
Bowers
Greer
#47
Kamenev
#58

Though that 47th pick could easily end up a legit top 6 or top 4 prospect like those in the 1st group...depending on which way we go with that pick.
 

Tweaky

Solid #2
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2009
5,548
1,801
Singapore/Thailand
A potential scoring liner & a potential 2/3 dman > a potential 2C
So a scoring line winger is more valuable than a scoring line center? Because 2nd line is still a scoring line. Even when used as a matchup line, it is still expected to score. Unless you are projecting Shvyryov to replace Rantanen or Landeskog on MacK's line?

Also, by your list, Meloche is the #3 RD, not counting what we already have. I would think that puts his ceiling at mid/bottom pairing, at least for the Avs. Nobody has locked down the 2C spot yet, and although there are guys ahead of him (Jost, Kerfoot, Compher, Kamenev), some will slide to wing, some will cap out as 3rd/4th liners. 2C > 3rd pair D. But again, these are all expectations at this point.

Shvyryov potential as an Av caps out at 2nd line winger. Bowers caps out as 2nd line center. Center is more valuable IMO, but there is more room for a winger...so they are pretty close as far as total value, as Bowers will have to beat out more guys to lock down that 2C spot.

Personally, I put Bowers in the second tier, along with Shvyryov and Meloche, and maybe Kamenev. Third tier is Greer, 47, 58, etc. Top tier is Makar, Timmins and #16 as long as they don't screw the pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patagonia

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,624
3,246
Top 4 / Top 6 guys:
Makar
#16
Timmins
Meloche
Shvyryov

Middle 6 / Top 9 guys:
Bowers
Greer
#47
Kamenev
#58

Though that 47th pick could easily end up a legit top 6 or top 4 prospect like those in the 1st group...depending on which way we go with that pick.

Seems like shuffling the deck.

Makar might have the higher upside, but Timmins had the much better year. 16th will be a good asset in this deep draft. Bowers potential is understated after a great season at BU, will have a better idea after next year. Kamenev has been an exceptional AHL player the last 3 years and likely making the AVs roster this season. Shvyryov is an unknown and not sure if his skills can translate with the smaller ice. Meloche has steadily improved after early season struggles due to the AHL affiliate and injuries. Greer is borderline 3rd or 4th liner and might be a serviceable trade asset. I changed the last pick for Lewis after reaching 100 points for the season, doubtful #58 would be a better player.

Makar
Timmins
#16
Bowers
Kamenev
Shvyryov
Meloche
#47
Greer
Lewis
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,554
19,390
w/ Renly's Peach
So a scoring line winger is more valuable than a scoring line center? Because 2nd line is still a scoring line. Even when used as a matchup line, it is still expected to score. Unless you are projecting Shvyryov to replace Rantanen or Landeskog on MacK's line?

Also, by your list, Meloche is the #3 RD, not counting what we already have. I would think that puts his ceiling at mid/bottom pairing, at least for the Avs. Nobody has locked down the 2C spot yet, and although there are guys ahead of him (Jost, Kerfoot, Compher, Kamenev), some will slide to wing, some will cap out as 3rd/4th liners. 2C > 3rd pair D. But again, these are all expectations at this point.

Shvyryov potential as an Av caps out at 2nd line winger. Bowers caps out as 2nd line center. Center is more valuable IMO, but there is more room for a winger...so they are pretty close as far as total value, as Bowers will have to beat out more guys to lock down that 2C spot.

Personally, I put Bowers in the second tier, along with Shvyryov and Meloche, and maybe Kamenev. Third tier is Greer, 47, 58, etc. Top tier is Makar, Timmins and #16 as long as they don't screw the pick.

Thanks for making me explain the joke...

but a) how we end up using a prospect doesn't retroactive change their talent & upside beyond affecting their development in the NHL...nevermind that Meloche is probably a better fit to partner Girard than Timmins, so it very well could be Timmins who ends up on the 3rd pairing having to move the puck for someone like Nemo. So whether Shvyryov ends up replacing Mikko on the first line so that Mikko can run his own line, or whether Meloche ends up going full Manson on our top pairing, doesn't matter. Their talent & potential is still of that caliber regardless of whether they'll be used in that way.

b) those projections are also fairly facetious. If I had been realistic, Meloche would just be a top 4 prospect, Shvyry just a top 6 prospect & Bowers just a middle 6 prospect.

Seems like shuffling the deck.

Makar might have the higher upside, but Timmins had the much better year. 16th will be a good asset in this deep draft. Bowers potential is understated after a great season at BU, will have a better idea after next year. Kamenev has been an exceptional AHL player the last 3 years and likely making the AVs roster this season. Shvyryov is an unknown and not sure if his skills can translate with the smaller ice. Meloche has steadily improved after early season struggles due to the AHL affiliate and injuries. Greer is borderline 3rd or 4th liner and might be a serviceable trade asset. I changed the last pick for Lewis after reaching 100 points for the season, doubtful #58 would be a better player.

Makar
Timmins
#16
Bowers
Kamenev
Shvyryov
Meloche
#47
Greer
Lewis

Comparing Timmins to Makar is silly. One has elite talent, the other doesn't.

You are massively under-rating Greer's skill level by calling him a 3rd or 4th liner when he's a top 9 prospect

And a lot of guys who never amount to anything break 100 points in junior. Lewis and Smirnov are much less likely to ever be an NHLer than #58.
 
Last edited:

landy92mack29

Registered User
May 5, 2014
27,646
3,260
saskatchewan
Heading into the draft my top 10 is:

1-Makar

2-Meloche
3-Bowers

4-Kamenev
5-Greer
6-Lewis
7-Timmins
8-Beaudin
9-Shvyryov


10-Barron
HM-Henry
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,152
37,330
Very curious to how this list will play out this year...


My early crack at the Top 10 is probably something like....


1. Cale Makar
2. Connor Timmins
3. Shane Bowers
4. #16 Pick
5. Nicolas Meloche
6. Vladislav Kamenev
7. AJ Greer
8.#47 Pick
9. Cam Morrison
10. #58 Pick
Depending on how the draft picks work out this is probably mine too lol.
My top 5 right now is definitely Makar, Timmins, Bowers, Meloche, Kamenev in that exact order.
 

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,624
3,246
Thanks for making me explain the joke...

but a) how we end up using a prospect doesn't retroactive change their talent & upside beyond affecting their development in the NHL...nevermind that Meloche is probably a better fit to partner Girard than Timmins, so it very well could be Timmins who ends up on the 3rd pairing having to move the puck for someone like Nemo. So whether Shvyryov ends up replacing Mikko on the first line so that Mikko can run his own line, or whether Meloche ends up going full Manson on our top pairing, doesn't matter. Their talent & potential is still of that caliber regardless of whether they'll be used in that way.

b) those projections are also fairly facetious. If I had been realistic, Meloche would just be a top 4 prospect, Shvyry just a top 6 prospect & Bowers just a middle 6 prospect.



Comparing Timmins to Makar is silly. One has elite talent, the other doesn't.

You are massively under-rating Greer's skill level by calling him a 3rd or 4th liner when he's a top 9 prospect

And a lot of guys who never amount to anything break 100 points in junior. Lewis and Smirnov are much less likely to ever be an NHLer than #58.

I ranked Makar as the top prospect due his high upside, although, Timmins had the much better year. Not sure what you’re trying to comment. Greer career has stalled, but still a decent prospect. He is not good enough for either the 1st or 2nd lines or better than Kamenev. Where do seriously believe he’ll be playing? Lewis is a long shot, but plays in a good league and scored 100 points and deservedly should get some consideration.
 

UncleRisto

Not Great, Bob!
Jul 7, 2012
30,898
25,887
Finland
Depending on how the draft picks work out this is probably mine too lol.
My top 5 right now is definitely Makar, Timmins, Bowers, Meloche, Kamenev in that exact order.
Ditto, although I'm not a 100% sure I trust Meloche to reach his upside over Kamenev. (No one tell @cgf.) But I been on Kamenev's d**k.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgf

Tommy Shelby

Registered User
Feb 26, 2012
7,466
4,855
Bowers being severely underrated here.

Also nearly one calendar year later and I'm still not convinced that Makar will be a better NHLer than Timmins. Flame away :dunno:
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,554
19,390
w/ Renly's Peach
Bowers being severely underrated here.

Also nearly one calendar year later and I'm still not convinced that Makar will be a better NHLer than Timmins. Flame away :dunno:

Huh? I'm the only one so far who doesn't have Bowers as his top forward or as one of our top 3 prospects.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad