This lineup has me beg to question.. what could we get for a package of C.Miller+Heinen/Debrusk/Vatrano+1st? Seems like enough pieces to land an pretty good player.
Marchand Bergeron Heinen
Bjork Krejci Pastrnak
DeBrusk Backes Nash
Vatrano Kuraly Acciari
Schaller
(JFK by January and Backes to RW and Nash to 4th line)
Moore signs delete Schaller
Lot of Blidh on 4th
Chara McAvoy
Krug Carlo
Killer McQuaid
O'Gara
Any line up without either McQuaid or K. Miller in the top 4 sounds great to me.
You must be ecstatic they are showing up on third pair
Maybe so. But I believe most posters feel that keeping both is duplicative and the team is better served by exposing one or both in the expansion draft.I know I will be. Both players are grossly underrated by most HF ers.
Maybe so. But I believe most posters feel that keeping both is duplicative and the team is better served by exposing one or both in the expansion draft.
Maybe so. But I believe most posters feel that keeping both is duplicative and the team is better served by exposing one or both in the expansion draft.
[/B]
Both? C Miller would be my guy to expose ,no big loss there. The other two have trade value at least if you want them gone so bad.
It's scary to think what the D would be without one of the two.
To many young puppies coming up on the D side need some snarl there as well. Z can do just so much at this point
My revised line-up
Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak
XXX-Krejci-XXX
Debrusk-Backes-Iginla
Acciari-Nash-Kuraly
I think one of Krejci's wingers will be aquired this summer and the other will be a rookie. That's a damn good bottom 6.
People should not read anything into Iginla buying a house here. He enrolled his kid at Dexter in Brookline and clearly must plan to move here in retirement. Surely if he intends to play any longer he could manage 1-2 years on the road.
Related, I want no part of him here. Doesn't make any sense to me.
Explain to me why C. Miller is the obvious choice? He had the highest Corsi% 5 v. 5 in the the entire league based on guys that played over 800 minutes. He's significantly younger, on a better contract, and brings more offensively than either K. Miller or McQ. Is he the player those guys are currently? No. But when he's 29 or 30, I would expect a much better player than either of those guys. It wouldn't be ideal to lose K. Miller, but he can be replaced in time. If you keep C. Miller, the RHD is set for the foreseeable future.
Could also be a moot point as they may trade for a defenseman.
You already have it figured out. Lets keep him and give him a raise, he deserves it.
IMO
Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta
Cehlarik - Krejci- Bjork
Acciari - Kulary - Backes
Debrusk- Heinen- Nash
Chara - Mcavoy
Krug - Carlo
Zboril - K. Miller
Rask
Khudobin
Marchand-Bergy-Pasta
Landeskog-Krejci-Bjork
Vatrano-JFK-Backes
Beleskey-DoMo-Heinen
Nash, Schaller, Acciari
Chara-McAvoy
Krug-Carlo
C.Miller-K.Miller
Morrow
Rask
Dobi
A combination of prospect, a pick and Spooner going to Colorado for Landeskog.
I don't see that team making the playoffs. A lot of guys with contracts missing from this line up. I can see the Bruins burying Jimmy Hayes in Providence for a year but where's Vatrano, Beleskey, Spooner?
IMO
Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta
Cehlarik - Krejci- Bjork
Acciari - Kulary - Backes
Debrusk- Heinen- Nash
Chara - Mcavoy
Krug - Carlo
Zboril - K. Miller
Rask
Khudobin