Matt24
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2013
- 5,732
- 2,490
And you blame Trout for that?
Not really, I just can't vote for a guy as MVP on a team that bad unless his numbers were WAY above everyone else's.
And you blame Trout for that?
Good start boys.
Can't blame the whole team for Happ walking three players.
I'd vote for Betts. I care that the Angels suck. Maybe if they were .500 team I wouldn't but they're not.
Can't blame the whole team for Happ walking three players.
It's not Mike Trout's fault the rest of his team is godawful. The MVP is an individual award. It makes no sense to hold anything against an individual that is out of his control or the fault of other people.
Saying that the Angels suck discounts Trout's MVP case is like saying that David Ortiz hitting nearly 40 HRs makes Betts' case better.
Can't blame the whole team for Happ walking three players.
It's a personal interpretation of the award, sorry you disagree, but many feel the same way as me.
That doesn't make it right however. Trout is the best player in the world, and he should be recognized for it.
It's not Mike Trout's fault the rest of his team is godawful. The MVP is an individual award. It makes no sense to hold anything against an individual that is out of his control or the fault of other people.
Saying that the Angels suck discounts Trout's MVP case is like saying that David Ortiz hitting nearly 40 HRs makes Betts' case better.
i'll never understood that. if you're good. you're good. it shouldn't matter if the team sucks, it should even speak more how good you are, that yo are that good and your team sucks.