Sam I Am
Registered User
Columbus is definitely a suitable trade partner to move down. They might want to get a late first to draft local boy Jack Roslevic who's expected to be picked around our pick. 34 + 68 for the 26 + 2016 third round pick.
Not sure that the swap of 3rd round picks is enough to justify going down 8 positions with our first. 68th overall may not be that much of an improvement over our 2016 3rd-rounder which could be around 80th overall.
How about 34 + 68 for our 26 + our 2015 fifth rounder?
Moving down could be interesting in our situation, but I don't think they'll do it. At 26, they will have a player in mind that they will very much like. Letting 8 more teams draft before you (moving down with Columbus) means their player will most likely be off the board at their new spot. All that to get another pick? A case could be by moving down with Buffalo, but I think Columbus is too far.
The rankings after the top ten or fifteen should be taken with a huge grain salt. The players are quite tightly grouped. It could very well be that Timmons guesses that the player he has his eye on will still be there at 36th. Let's say it is Cernak or Siegenthaler or Novak or Chlapik or Yan. Why not trade down and pick up another solid prospect?
In another thread, Habs fans are being asked to vote for the team's pick from among the players left after the the other teams' fans have chose 1-15. Most votes are going to Sprong, Bittner and Julssen. The best of what's left at 26...according to the HF armchair GMS. Frankly, I'd rather go with any one of dozens of possible tandems that could be obtained by trading down, such as:
Cernak and Garland
Siegenthaler and Beauviller
Chlapik and Yan
Novak and Brisebois
Invent your own!
Last edited by a moderator: