Is comparing teams from different era merely using wins or points accurate? I say no. The Hawks won the 67 regular season by a whopping 17 points led by Art Ross, Hart, and Lady Byng winner Stan Mikita, the Vezina winners Glenn Hall & Denis DeJordy, and All-Stars Bobby Hull, Pierre Pilote, and Kenny Wharram. Pretend the NHL played 82 games in 1967, the Hawks scored 102 points, and I came on here and said the 2015-2016 Panthers were better, because they scored 103 points. Knowledgeable fans would laugh me off the board. Not all eras are equal.
Criticizing Kobe for taking 50 shots shows a total lack of NBA knowledge. I agree with every NBA player I've ever heard or read on this point. It's difficult hard work for a 29 year old to get off 25 shots. For Kobe to get off 50, make almost half, score 60 points, break Curry's 2016 single game scoring record, and win his last game despite all the media pressure is a remarkable accomplishment that should only be praised. Oh well. Haters gonna hate. And get salty.
Criticizing Kobe for taking 50 shots shows a total lack of NBA knowledge. I agree with every NBA player I've ever heard or read on this point. It's difficult hard work for a 29 year old to get off 25 shots. For Kobe to get off 50, make almost half, score 60 points, break Curry's 2016 single game scoring record, and win his last game despite all the media pressure is a remarkable accomplishment that should only be praised. Oh well. Haters gonna hate. And get salty.
Last edited: