g00n
Retired Global Mod
- Nov 22, 2007
- 30,629
- 14,719
Bettman became commissioner in February 1993. At that point, San Jose, Ottawa, and Tampa Bay were already functioning franchises. Florida and Anaheim had been awarded expansion franchises in December 1992, also before Bettman took office. In other words, five of the nine expansion teams were already in place before Bettman.
The North Stars moved to Dallas in the fall of 1993, however, they had stripped the "North" from their name back in 1991 and attempted to move the franchise to Anaheim before the Ducks were announced. That team was clearly on the move before Bettman took office.
Prior to getting an expansion team, Nashville tried to lure the Devils out of New Jersey. Bettman actually stepped in to help the Devils stay in New Jersey.
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/14/s...nd-new-jersey-call-truce-and-strike-deal.html
I don't know what anyone expected Bettman to have to done to keep Hartford from moving. Karmanos didn't want to stay in Hartford, and had serious disagreements with the governor of Connecticut. It got to the point where Karmanos announced the team was leaving Connecticut before he even settling on a new home. Unless you expected Gary Bettman to go out and buy a few thousand season tickets himself and force people to attend rallies, I really don't know what you think could have been done to prevent that move.
I don't know if anyone said Bettman was responsible for ALL the expansion in the league, just over-expansion in general (which can be by one or two teams if they drag down the league) and protectionism regarding his southern franchises .
There were expansion teams even before the ones you listed, as well as mergers. That stuff happens. It's not the same as overexpanding and overfocusing on traditionally non-hockey markets. The Thrashers/Jets and Jets/Coyotes are examples of where things went wrong. And at the time of the CBA negotiations and lost season, franchises like that were a major concern.
You're also missing or downplaying Bettman's refusal to contract any of the southern teams that were struggling prior to profit sharing. That was a major part of his platform and one that he would not budge on. His protection of the league as an expanding entity with particular focus on southern markets in the US cost the NHL and entire season.
Bottom line, 11 years later there are still problems, but the league is in decent shape as a whole so he gets a new contract.