BonkTastic
ಠ_ಠ
What are you talking about? He was a 3rd round pick.I suggest you look at our friend Zack's career progression
http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=14495
Kid was never even ppg in junior. Never good enough to get drafted.
Donald Brashear was a point-per-game player in the AHL as a 21 year old. Konopka had multiple near-PPG seasons in the AHL. It means jack poop.Then put up good offensive seasons in the AHL... then goes near ppg in the AHL playoffs when the Sens go on to win.
The bottom line is, he's super talented and his basic hockey skills are all top notch. Shooting, skating, passing, puck handling, faceoffs, strength, it's all there. Everything.
If this were true, he wouldn't be losing his 4th line center job. Guys with top notch skills who are super talented are not 5th line centers as 25 year olds. Homer glasses.
Even at 25 years old he can still improve, obviously. Really in his first full year he produced at a 25 point pace, and it was the same last year in a shortened. He is by no means a lock to improve on that, but still, it's very possible that he does.
Especially if he gets away from playing with Chris Neil on the 4th line. Even if you think he's old, he still has potential.
I don't think he's "old", I think hes old enough that he's getting into the "you can't teach old dogs new tricks" stage of his career. I can't think of too many guys who drastically improve their game after they are 25 years old. And getting away from Chris Neil on our 4th line and moving to playing with Ben Eager on Edmonton's 4th line is a lateral move at best.
A 25 year old 4th liner is no more valuable than a 30 year old 4th liner, assuming skill is equal. All are entirely replaceable. Youth is valuable on your 4th line if they are young enough to still be developing, or if their contract is cheap enough that it can offset a more expensive contract elsewhere on the roster, neither of which Smith brings.Campbell is 30. That's 5 less years of hockey playing and has huge effect on trade value.
I'm not saying the Oil would make the trade, or that any GM would make the trade.
So why are you proposing, and subsequently defending, the trade?