thepuckguru
Registered User
- Jan 6, 2017
- 87
- 22
Yes, I'm aware of that. Still not worth it.
No chance. Canes taking their “Superstar at. #2” - Waddell. No interest in messing that up for a rental.
its a mess up because zadina isn't expected to be a superstar while svechnikov is.How would you mess up if you have pac+ ZADINA. hhahahahahahahah how is this a mess up ?
This is insanity . Zadina + pac for Svech and they are saying " hard pass" LMAO go back to your budget team, this is just plain dumb to refuse this ridiculous proposal.
This is insanity . Zadina + pac for Svech and they are saying " hard pass" LMAO go back to your budget team, this is just plain dumb to refuse this ridiculous proposal.
This is insanity . Zadina + pac for Svech and they are saying " hard pass" LMAO go back to your budget team, this is just plain dumb to refuse this ridiculous proposal.
I agree the consensus pick is Svechnikov, but that gap isn't that big. I've seen some lists where Zadina was #2, and it would not be a crazy thing.The difference between Svech and Zadina is gigantic. 1 year of Patches does not get you the much better player.
The difference between Svech and Zadina is gigantic. 1 year of Patches does not get you the much better player.
Put me in this situation and I pull the trigger anytime lolIf Montreal had #2 and the Canes offered #3 + Skinner then Montreal shouldn’t do it either. Svechnikov is just that much better.
How would you mess up if you have pac+ ZADINA. hhahahahahahahah how is this a mess up ?
pacioretty is grossly underrated on hfboards
I agree the consensus pick is Svechnikov, but that gap isn't that big. I've seen some lists where Zadina was #2, and it would not be a crazy thing.
I would never do that deal, I'm just fine with Zadina or whoever we pick, I don't see the difference between two of the 3 best prospects to be worth Patches, like at all.
Disagree the difference between Svechnikov and Zadina is "gigantic". I give the edge to Svechnikov for sure though. 12 months from now, the story with these top 10 picks will be much different. Some will stall in development... happens all the time
This is insanity . Zadina + pac for Svech and they are saying " hard pass" LMAO go back to your budget team, this is just plain dumb to refuse this ridiculous proposal.
If Montreal had #2 and the Canes offered #3 + Skinner then Montreal shouldn’t do it either. Svechnikov is just that much better.
So all you say is based on your personal belief... which is fine by me, but doesn't provide much in arguments in a "debate".I'm not sure I have Zadina in the top-5 come draft day personally, so in my opinion yes the gap is gigantic. But that is all opinion based thinking.
I just don't see the value for the Canes being a cap team that won't re-sign him and don't have serious Stanley Cup aspirations next season. At best they trade him at the deadline for a 1st+, but even then they're essentially getting the worse prospect (by a lot in my eyes), and a late 1st + prospect.
I'm not sure I have Zadina in the top-5 come draft day personally, so in my opinion yes the gap is gigantic. But that is all opinion based thinking.
I just don't see the value for the Canes being a cap team that won't re-sign him, and don't have serious Stanley Cup aspirations next season. At best they trade him at the deadline for a 1st+, but even then they're essentially getting the worse prospect (by a lot in my eyes), a late 1st and maybe a prospect from a contender.
it depends on how you rank these prospects.How would you mess up if you have pac+ ZADINA. hhahahahahahahah how is this a mess up ?
So all you say is based on your personal belief... which is fine by me, but doesn't provide much in arguments in a "debate".
The issue is an opinion of the gap being gigantic to justify the trade with the Habs who prefer not to make the trade. It won't work with convincing us (majority of us anyways). There are a lot of Habs fans high on Svechnikov. However, I do know the Canes are very much interested in Zadina too. So the Habs will select whoever is left at the 3rd spot. It's pretty simple for us. Then we see what 1st and other piece we can get with Patch.
Sorry, this trade proposal is not one we are interested in
Exactly this. You might, or might not be right. We just can't know.Well that's fine. All scouting/rankings are opinion based. Still didn't stop me from taking Puljujarvi out of my top-3 as well in 2016.
[MOD]
That's fine. I have no horse in the race. I just don't see the value for the Canes moving forward.