Organization doesn't care/inept, so why should we?This is the saddest commentary on this team - only 2 pages of post game comments....
Found the replay for anyone else wondering:What happened to Laughton?
I thought it was exceptional how much they involved the Flyers players to emphasize the "We all play on the same team" theme.Tippett was phenomenal in this game. I think some of his passes were more impressive than the goals. The one that set up Frost in front was pretty slick.
Sanheim needs to sneak in like that more often. Nice anticipation and sweet goal.
Are they going to lose Laughton too? Coots, Atkinson, JVR, TK, Allison, Laughton. That’s just unbelievable.
I thought the Hockey Fights Cancer segment just before the game was pretty special. Made me tear up seeing those young kids fighting for their lives. I wish them and their families well. Hits harder when you’re a parent too.
MacEwen has indeed made some surprising skill plays this season. But he also has won many races to pucks. He's been an effective player.I am way more impressed with Mac's puck skills this year vs his board work tbh. He's got decent bottom 6 skills. He scored 52points in the AHL a few seasons ago, 18 points on the pp. Pretty respectable totals. He is scoring at a decent clip right now, and the underlying metrics are pretty stable, but I do wonder if he sustains his scoring touch.
My issue with him is his lack of anticipation. Just because he gets to the boards doesn't mean he is getting results. I imagine he has a lot of pressures, but I know he doesn't have many turnovers. He just can't process quick enough.
Do you think MacEwen is a better offensive player than Frost?MacEwen has indeed made some surprising skill plays this season. But he also has won many races to pucks. He's been an effective player.
He's 7th on the team in points with 7 in 16 games. That's 3 more points than golden boy Frost, who has 4 in 17 games.
Yet "objective" posters continue to beat on Zack relentlessly. It's silliness. The man has more than done his job for a $900k depth player.
Do you think that's what I argued?Do you think MacEwen is a better offensive player than Frost?
Zach the player isn't the problem. Zach's usage is. He's a bottom six/fourth line forward. We have a first round pick in Lehigh Valley in Tyson Foerster who's offers much more skill and ability than Zach and he's stuck there. For a rebuilding team, or so we're told a rebuilding team, does it not make sense to have the first round pick playing in the NHL, learning the NHL game? Does it not make sense that you want the first round pick playing in that middle six spot, especially when that's his upside? Or does the first round pick need to continue being schooled in the Ian Laperriere 'checking-only-no-skill' development school in Lehigh Valley because that's how you develop players in Uncle Schmuck's world?MacEwen has indeed made some surprising skill plays this season. But he also has won many races to pucks. He's been an effective player.
He's 7th on the team in points with 7 in 16 games. That's 3 more points than golden boy Frost, who has 4 in 17 games.
Yet "objective" posters continue to beat on Zack relentlessly. It's silliness. The man has more than done his job for a $900k depth player.
After watching Foerster, I think he needs a year in the AHL and a summer working on his skating. He's 20, and he's not some uber-talent being buried, he's a skilled player with mediocre skating skills who needs work. And I wouldn't rush Desnoyers or Wisdom, they're also 20 and have missed some PT the last two seasons, again, don't rush them to appease bored fans.Zach the player isn't the problem. Zach's usage is. He's a bottom six/fourth line forward. We have a first round pick in Lehigh Valley in Tyson Foerster who's offers much more skill and ability than Zach and he's stuck there. For a rebuilding team, or so we're told a rebuilding team, does it not make sense to have the first round pick playing in the NHL, learning the NHL game? Does it not make sense that you want the first round pick playing in that middle six spot, especially when that's his upside? Or does the first round pick need to continue being schooled in the Ian Laperriere 'checking-only-no-skill' development school in Lehigh Valley because that's how you develop players in Uncle Schmuck's world?
So yeah, using an inferior player in a role that they simply aren't suited for, is a problem. And it's been a problem for four years. Isn't a GM's job to ensure that the team continually gets better? If that's the case, why has this club gotten progressively worse under Schmuck? Would you say that's good GMing?
Just stop, dude. You aren't being realistic. Any team is going to struggle with RW depth if it loses its top three RWs to injury.
Oh, and Fletcher's top RW prospect, Bobby Brink, is out due to injury.
Oh, and JVR who can play RW is out due to injury.
Oh, and they were playing with a short bench due to Laughton's injury.
Oh, and the organization's prospect depth is limited because of so many draft whiffs that pre-date Chuck.
Meanwhile Zack MacEwen has done an admirable job playing above his pay grade at RW with 7 points in 16 games.
To complain about MacEwen this season is to complain based on reputation and personal dislike rather than his play.
After watching Foerster, I think he needs a year in the AHL and a summer working on his skating. He's 20, and he's not some uber-talent being buried, he's a skilled player with mediocre skating skills who needs work. And I wouldn't rush Desnoyers or Wisdom, they're also 20 and have missed some PT the last two seasons, again, don't rush them to appease bored fans.
Laczynski and Lycksell are probably the closest to NHL ready, and you might look at Marody, Brooks is still injured, I think.
No I don’t think that’s what you argued. Nor was it meant as an argumentative statement.Do you think that's what I argued?
Regardless, he's been the more productive offensive player.
NAK went scoreless for 14 games n the playoffs, was benched, then went unsigned by that team while they signed two veteran forwards over him, was waived by his next team, and immediately got himself suspended for a dirty hit on his 4th team in two years.NAK's career went down the drain as he proceeded to play in the SCF, win a Cup, get signed by the Leafs, and then claimed by the Caps.
I'm not a smart man but... I think i'll side with the braintrusts in those organizations over Chuck Fletcher/French Allen and Co.
Ah, you're removing any and all context. Well done.NAK went scoreless for 14 games n the playoffs, was benched, then went unsigned by that team while they signed two veteran forwards over him, was waived by his next team, and immediately got himself suspended for a dirty hit on his 4th team in two years.
Sugarcoat it all you want, that's a downward spiral.
NAK went scoreless for 14 games n the playoffs, was benched, then went unsigned by that team while they signed two veteran forwards over him, was waived by his next team, and immediately got himself suspended for a dirty hit on his 4th team in two years.
Sugarcoat it all you want, that's a downward spiral.
NAK's career went down the drain as he proceeded to play in the SCF, win a Cup, get signed by the Leafs, and then claimed by the Caps.
I'm not a smart man but... I think i'll side with the braintrusts in those organizations over Chuck Fletcher/French Allen and Co.
I'll get this out of the way:I remember when being used by an NHL coach alone was proof that a player is worthwhile. Now, suddenly, being used by an NHL coach on a Cup winning team with so much depth they could have Burakovsky on the 4th line isn't proof a player has merit.
Really hilarious how the standards blatantly shift as needed to defend the worst management in the NHL.
He obviously has little to no trade value and not much on-ice value either. Otherwise he wouldn't get waived all the time. Caps fans are already fed up with him.He wasn't benched. He was injured. You know better than to judge a player solely by point production, too. All of these things have been pointed out to you repeatedly, so you know better.
You are willingly and knowingly lying to defend a failure on Fletcher's part.