I would be shocked if Seattle takes Vladar this summer over their other options in our D.
When Halak leaves I don't see Boston resigning him. That is not to say Halak does not deserve another contract, it's not an indictment on his play or ability.
More of a testament to Vladar's who has done very well in his time in Providence and is ready to get his feet wet at back-up. Toss in his cheap price tag and
I am certain management will go forward with him next season in the NHL.
The real question is will the GM re-sign Tuukka or replace him with another Veteran. Rask may not want another contract, there is evidence to support that theory.
But minds can change and we really don't know where Rask is in his commitment to the Bruins or the NHL in general.
If Rask stays then I see Vladar at backup to get him much-needed experience. This would open up Providence for Swayman to get starter pro experience in the AHL.
If Rask retires or goes the UFA route then I see Sweeney trying to retain Halak and trying to hold the fort with a Vladar/Jaro tandem to buy Swayman time to mature.
If Sweeney wants to make another run with the core and Rask leaves then they could be in the market for a big-name goaltender, in which I still think Vladar is backup.
Swayman is 2 years out, IMO. Vladar is ready now, there just is no room for him outside of significant injury to Halak/Rask.
I also believe Rask will be back on a short deal(3 years?) which will bridge the gap for Swayman to be able to take over.
Vladar is a filler piece in the Bruins plan as I see it. No high expectations, so anything other than a solid backup NHL career would just be gravy.