LonLon Lei
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2018
- 2,187
- 950
quack quackwe lost 2 out of last 3 game vs ducks.
I've heard they were starving (lost 6 straight on the road) so we felt bad and fed them.we lost 2 out of last 3 games vs ducks.
I hope so, given how that story ends.Can someone tell me what's up with Stamkos.?.I keep.waiting for him to go on a goal scoring explosion....now im wondering ..are those days over?
He is the Canadian Ovie or at least he was
We're all waitingCan someone tell me what's up with Stamkos.?.I keep.waiting for him to go on a goal scoring explosion....now im wondering ..are those days over?
He is the Canadian Ovie or at least he was
When Strålman comes back, I'd really like if they let Cernak stay with Mac, put Stråls with Hedman and sit Sergachev for a couple. Even with his occasional rookie mistake, Cernak has been more defensively solid during his few games so far.
They'll probably never sit Girardi.
I'd rather see McDonagh-Stralman. They were too good. Hedman-Cernak would take a little pressure off Cernak, because he wouldn't be up against top lines every night.
You do have a good point. McStrals was pretty dang dominant as our main shutdown pair, taking on the top lines. It was shocking how the defense didn't seem to miss a beat when Hedman went down as McStrals simply became the top pairing, munched minutes, scored points and was generally outstanding. And we do know that Heddy can play fine with a young one, especially one that looks to be better than Dotchin was.
It just looks like Mac has some good solid chemistry with Cernak even with the kid facing some top lines already. Plus we know that Hedman-Strålman can be a solid 'we will shut you dowwwwn' pair as well. It would be rather nice to have two dominant "none shall pass" pairs.
But, whatever will be, will be. Thursday is still going to be a fun game.
At that post? Yeah. It was real bad.Still laughing?