Alikhan Alizada
Registered User
- Jul 16, 2017
- 409
- 179
If Tatar is traded he will def fetch a 1st+ but then again he isn't a rental so it doesn't apply.
I'd think so, but then they may be asking "would we rather get something for a guy that will not be back that has serious value, or would we rather maybe make a push for 8th place?"Isnt it worth holding on to him at the risk of missing the playoffs?
Clear sellers of ufas are LA, SJ, Ana, Det, Ott, NJ, Buf, NYR. Likely Mon, Min added to list soon.
so I agree that of all ufas on these teams Kreider would get the highest price. Now, if one of these teams is selling a player with a contract past this season that is a different matter.
every other team is still in the mix.
Friedman is only talking ufas. Thus he used the word rental.That's the thing. I just don't see teams willing to give up a 1st for the rentals out there this year. But someone will give a 1st for a player with term from one of those sellers, meaning one less team looking for a rental. Which further drives down the price for rentals.
They're 5-5-0 in their last 10 games, still 9 points out with multiple teams to pass for a WC spot and Kreider is a UFA who they probably won't re-sign... he's almost certainly getting traded unless the Rangers win at least 6 or 7 of their next 8 games before the deadline and even then he still might move.
I think Pageau is getting a first, easily.
From who?
Any team who wants a playoff warrior with no quit, who can score timely goals. Also a beast on the PK.
I think whoever gets Pageau is really going to appreciate what he brings.
Oh sure, he is a nice player. But, he isn't up to snuff with the other players who have netted 1st in the last couple seasons.
Go to ~7:45 --> Elliotte Friedman from NHL Hockey on Rogers - Oilers NOW with Bob Stauffer - Omny.fm
He went on to suggest that if Pageau got one, it would likely be a conditional pick. The Panthers might get one for Hoffman, if they make him available.
I found this to be interesting. The rental class is weak. Would the demand still be strong? Would we see the 1st round premium be attached to guys that might not return that pick in a different marketplace? Listening to these Friedman radio spots leading up to the deadline, the answering is trending to be no.
There’s lots of other interesting tidbits throughout that segment. It's well worth listening to the whole thing, imo.
Too many teams packed together. Think just 5 have 70 points or more. The next 12-15 teams are within 6 points of each other.I feel more and more GM's are getting reluctant to move a 1st in a Cap driven league. Unless it is a true first line player or top pairing D man and your team is that one piece away it is a really tough call.
As for the Rangers and Kreider. The Rangers are going to have about 16.5 mil in cap space with the following top players needing contracts for next season so do the math:
Kreider UFA
Strome RFA
Fast UFA
Lemieux RFA
DeAngelo RFA
Georgiev RFA (possible trade with Shesterkin on board but Georgiev make the least out of all the potential UFA/RFA's and that's if Georgiev only brings back futures or picks in a trade).
Combined they currently make 12.2 mil and all will be getting raises.
I feel the Rangers should resign Kreider and make the tougher decisions on others
I'm still not sure why the Rangers wouldn't just re-sign him, especially if they think they can compete sooner rather than later.
Why would the Panthers move Hoffman for futures?
Like, they arent exactly locked in to a playoff spot
That's less than 5 more wins than the team they're chasing. Yes, probably out, but definitely doable in 29 games. Just don't think Nyr aren't that team.They're 9 points out with 29 to go. They're done.
Yeah you think Tampa might consider trading with a different team that well is not producing any water....Come to Tampa, just like all the others.