I'm with you, Hynes will almost certainly be here to stay for the rest of the season no matter the result. If things continue to spiral downward the rest of this year like they've been or if the end result winds up as a step back from last year, then I think we'll see Hynes on the hot seat to start next season.
Shero isn't going to change direction on his plan this early. What we have had to fix organizationally isn't an overnight fix and he understands that so the rush isn't there to just fire Hynes this early. With a bigger sample size such as the two seasons and a potential step back, then you start keeping a closer eye on things.
At this point our reactions aren't even over-reactions. This has been a solid months worth of the same thing, 14 games which is close to 1/4 of the season.
Aside from Kovy, Elias, and Zajac, we had Arnott who was actually a bright spot for us in that down swing, Zubrus who was always consistent, Rolston although not what he was, was still useful. Tedenby and Nick Palmieri came in and made impacts. On defense we were better than the year prior (which was a very competitive season save for some issues after Langenbrunner soured) having added Volchenkov and Tallinder in favor of Mottau and Mark Fraser, and Mark Fayne came in and made a nice impact.
The roster for the most part was there that season. It goes without saying Lemaire was a great coach, however things clicked quite quickly after he took over because he put an actual system in place for a roster that was already good. The most frustrating part of whatever game plan Mac was running, was that the defense when transferring from the neutral zone to our offensive zone, played between the red/blue lines and no further. All of those dump and chases were so quickly over turned because we essentially had a 3 on 5.
That start under Mac still makes me shudder.