Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 29,590
- 25,416
Tanev, Blueger, ZAR, McCann
Blueger and McCann should be getting protected over Zucker as things stand - younger, cheaper, more important to the team.
Tanev, Blueger, ZAR, McCann
What about holl . That’s who I would want if I was seattleToronto will probably lose either Dermott or Kerfoot, assuming Hyman signs after the draft.
Not sure why we would protect Weber ? Respect? Not exactly an attractive option for Seattle .MtL will protect
Kk
Gallagher
Anderson
Toffoli
Drouin
Evans
Lehkhonen
(Handsgake deal with Danault and Tatar to be back after the ED)
Weber
Petry
Edmubdson
Allen
(Price will waive as it's a win win for him to do so)
So SEA gets to pick either Byron or Chiarot! Thanks
Tanev, Blueger, ZAR, McCann
The consensus 7 on the Pens board right now is Crosby, Malkin, Guentzel, Rust, Kapanen, Blueger, and McCann.
I'd love to hear an argument for Zucker over any of those players right now. Of the players on your list, McCann and Blueger are better this year, younger, and cheaper.
Cause Weber is still better than Chiarot, or an other D-man we'd protect.Not sure why we would protect Weber ? Respect? Not exactly an attractive option for Seattle .
And that take is such a short term take. GMs don't work that way. They look at the players entire body of work. And I can guarantee you that GMRH considers Zucker to be a more valuable piece going forward than Blueger. McCann because of his age and capability is more valuable than Blueger and thus he gets the last slot.
IMO, what they should do is protect McCann and then pay Seattle a 2nd round pick to not take Blueger. Then Seattle gets to choose from the following:
Tanev
ZAR
Matheson
DeSmith
I believe that is why GMRH stated they would not trade this year's 2nd round pick. So they can use it for the ED.
good chance the Leafs go 4-4-1 rather than 7-3-1What about holl . That’s who I would want if I was seattle
Montreal will lose Jake Allen unless they pay Seattle to take one of the plethora of bad contracts...it's almost a given...
I wouldn't be shocked to see the Oilers leave both Koskinen and Klefbom exposed. Klefbom, completely depending on his recovery and expecations on the ice, and Koskinen in hopes that they take him so we can start fresh with goalies next year. It says a lot about the Oilers that we might be in the position where we are protecting Josh Archibald. I love his energy, but he shouldn't be the type of guy we need to protect.Oilers may lose Neal, Kassian or Russell
They really got no one to protect if they walk away from Barrie, Larsson.
Drai, McD, Yama, Pulju, RNH? , Archibald? Benson?
Nurse and then a whole lot of meh. Lagesson? Jones? Bear? Russell? Klefbom?
They can add a goalie just to expose Koskinen
What good young Dman are we talking about?
If Oilers protect Klefbom, Nurse, Bear then there is nothing left on D that you cannot fill via waivers, free agency or from your farm system.
It's only an issue if EDM signs both Larsson and Barrie before expansion draft.
Calgary had protection questions going in to the season. They are pretty much gone now.
It appeared Sam Bennett would be left unprotected. He's gone now. At forward there's basically nothing worth taking left.
At D, Tanev has played himself into being protected and Gio has played himself out of it. Gio will be available if Seattle wants an aging almost $7 million dman. If I'm Seattle, Kylington might have enough upside to take. Honestly he isn't really being given a fair shake here at the moment.
I think Lagesson gets protected over Jones if we go 4 and 4. I don't think we do though, I think we may go 7/3/1 and protect McDavid, Draisaitl, Pulujarvi, Yamamoto, Archibald, Khaira, Benson for F, and Nurse, Lagesson and Bear for D (Klefbom left exposed due to injury concerns), and Skinner for goalie. I'm not sure if I try to swing a deal to have them pick anyone specific, as it would cost too much to do so for Neal. Kassian I'm sure won't be picked, but it could happen. Same with Russell or Turris, if there is nothing they really want and are okay with taking a cheap contract they can let expire in a year. Koskinen might actually get chosen, but I don't know if Holland actually exposes him.On cap Friendly the below is who I would protect for Edmonton
View attachment 422326
I would assume a handshake agreement with RNH that he re-signs after expansion draft. Maybe also with Smith, but really think the Oilers needs to find a different starter.
If we sign both, its a sign that Holland doesn't think Klefbom has anything left, and he is willing to protect 4 F and 4D. Might not be a horrible option in all honesty. Protect Nurse, Larsson, Barrie and Bear at D, McD, Drai, Pulujarvi and Yamamoto at F. Even under 4 and 4 we aren't losing anyone that we can't replace, aside from maybe Klefbom or Benson, and both are mysteries going forward.if Edmonton signs one of those - and let’s be serious, it’s us - that’ll mean losing either Klef or Bear.
The "take" is that Zucker has never found his niche here, and the other two play valuable roles.
Maybe Hextall bribes Seattle to not take a player, but if he doesn't, McCann and Blueger mean more to this team until Zucker shows otherwise. For Zucker to be worth 5.5 mil per to this team, he either has to find a way to click with Malkin, or be very productive in a bottom 6 role.
So far he's done neither.
I'll give you 2: he's capable of 30 goals and has a lot more value than McCann & Blueger combined.
Spoken like someone who hasn't watched him - or McCann and Blueger - play with the Pens at all.
Zucker is capable of 30 goals in the sense that he has scored 30 goals, once, 3 years ago. Unfortunately, he has been handily outplayed by both McCann and Blueger this year, who are in critical PP and defensive roles, far younger, and far cheaper.
The only time he looked like he was worth his money with the Pens was when he was on Crosby's LW last year, and when Guentzel's healthy that's simply not going to happen.