You are AV: Who is the 7th defenseman going into the season?

FLYLine27*

BUCH
Nov 9, 2004
42,410
14
NY
Now that the preseason is over...I'm sure the answer will be known tomorrow or the next couple days....who won it? Mci or Diaz. Factor in everything. Don't forget we will not be holding onto 8 per AV as we don't have the cap room.
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,099
10,855
Charlotte, NC
I like Diaz a lot and wish they would just carry 8 early in the season, but I understand their decision.

I think they've played pretty even overall, but you gotta give it to the young guy that you want with your organization for years to come. It also sends the right message to the rest of the youth like Skjei and Graves.
 

Wolfy*

Guest
Diaz for sure, reason: He has 4 points in 3 games, good puck handling and a decent shot, will be great on a PP team.

McIlrath is all zero except a bunch of penalty minutes...not exactly AV hockey.
 

BlueshirtBlitz

Foolish Samurai
Aug 2, 2010
21,431
30
New York
Diaz, because we trade Klein and McIlrath is the 6th ;).

Seriously though, it's McIlrath. Team has too many anchors on D right now to hope a 30 year old journeyman can suddenly be a good piece for a cup winning team. Go with the young guy with upside.
 

RGY

Kreid or Die
Jul 18, 2005
24,714
13,941
Long Island, NY
Klein will be here.
Mcilrath the 7th.

Diaz has a nice few tools but he is even smaller than Boyle. He can't bring the size elements those two bring to fill out the 6/7 spots. Yandle, Boyle, McDonagh and eventually Skjei can bring versions/aspects of what Diaz brings.
 

KeninsFan

Fire Benning already
Feb 6, 2012
5,489
0
Outsider opinion: Diaz fits AV's style perfectly. He loves the quick transitional defensemen as they're key to his system.
 

BlueshirtBlitz

Foolish Samurai
Aug 2, 2010
21,431
30
New York
Outsider opinion: Diaz fits AV's style perfectly. He loves the quick transitional defensemen as they're key to his system.

I agree, which is why it's odd he has yet to feature Yandle. In an ideal world where Diaz realized his full potential he'd be an AV stalwart, but the guy is a journeyman for a reason.

The Erik Christensen analogy from a different thread is absolutely spot on.
 

Esa 10

Registered User
Jul 12, 2006
1,126
48
McIlrath.

Easiest choice ever. Diaz is a dime a dozen guy that can be easily replaced with next year's version of Hunwick. McIlrath will be needed for a regular role next year when a vet, most likely Klein, will be moved for cap reasons. Dylan also looks like a perfectly adequate #7 right now. His physical play is unique within the current NYR D group. Diaz is merely a very poor man's version of Boyle and a one-armed, blind beggar's version of Yandle.

He won't get PP time with Yandle, Boyle, McD and AV's PP favourite, Girardi here anyway. Stralman couldn't displace Girardi on the point, now Diaz will do it? Really…

We also have a bunch of forwards who can play the point. It's not like Diaz is some sort of specialist, who put up amazing PP numbers during the course of his career. Marc Andre Bergeron he is not.
 
Last edited:

Esa 10

Registered User
Jul 12, 2006
1,126
48
Outsider opinion: Diaz fits AV's style perfectly. He loves the quick transitional defensemen as they're key to his system.

People often say this, but where's the evidence? Aaron Rome was an AV favourite in Vancouver. Fleet of foot and transitional are not the first, second or even third adjectives I associate with Rome.

AV also loves Girardi and Staal. He likes Klein's play. He certainly had some input in retaining all three and instead letting Stralman go.

All these decisions by AV run counter to this supposed preference for quick, transitional defensemen.
 

Placid

Registered User
Feb 17, 2010
5,906
339
From an economic perspective, trading Klein is a very bad idea. True that he is not exactly a 1st liner, but he is on a 2.9 million contract for another 3 (?) years (he is a UFA in 2018).

Next year, we'll lose Boyle. We'll also lose Yandle unless some other major piece is traded away, because his pay raise is likely to be very substantial.

So next year we'll have McD, Girardi, Staal, and.... ? Mci, Diaz and Skjei as the bottom 3 ?

Chances are that we'll have to cough up more than 2.9 to replace a similar skill set, or accept an inferior.

Well, thats my take on it anyway.. not claiming to be an expert or anything, and while Klein doesn't normally "wow" me, he is usually fairly solid.
 

pld459666

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
25,902
8,087
Danbury, CT
big fan of Diaz game in the sense of being smart on the PP, and his ability to carry the puck into the offensive zone. He also provides a bit of offensive pop from the 3rd paid when inserted.

However, I think Dylan has done enough to nail down the #7 spot and an argument could be made that he has played well enough to take a reg. shift as the teams #6 guy.

Dylan gets the nod here.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,730
33,016
Maryland
McIlrath.

Keep Klein. McIlrath playing well in the preseason is not reason to assume he's suddenly ready to take over for Klein night-in, night-out.
 

Mac n Gs

Gorton plz
Jan 17, 2014
22,594
12,928
Diaz won't have an impact on the powerplay when he's sitting in the pressbox. I'd prefer to trade Klein, recoup some assets, and roll with McIlrath as the 6th, while Diaz gets spot duty here and there.
 

Fitzy

Very Stable Genius
Jan 29, 2009
35,203
22,077
McIlrath has room to improve into a Sauer-like late bloomer. Diaz is what he is.

If its not going to be a consistent starter, might as well go with someone with room for growth.
 

Bleed Ranger Blue

Registered User
Jul 18, 2006
19,799
1,811
Keep 8. McIlrath #7 and Diaz #8. They are pretty much polar opposite players and I like the versatility that would bring if a defenseman goes down. I know AV said its looking like 13F and 7D but waiving Glass mitigates any cap problems.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,730
33,016
Maryland
McIlrath has room to improve into a Sauer-like late bloomer. Diaz is what he is.

If its not going to be a consistent starter, might as well go with someone with room for growth.

I agree with all points, but I do want to say, I don't really think it's fair to consider him a late bloomer. 23 is a very typical age for a guy to break into the league. It may be late by the standards of the tenth pick in the draft, but if he was picked in the second or third round it wouldn't see unusual at all. He was picked as a project and developed as a project.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad