I’d have done that deal in Colorado. It’ll be bad in 3 years, but who cares. Win now. Kuemper can.
Age is a big reason why Campbell got almost as much despite being much less prove . Campbell's contract ends when he's 35, while Kuemper's contract ends when he's 37.I'm surprised a proven starter only got 250K more than Campbell despite playing over double the games and consistently putting up much better numbers.
Maybe teams were wary because of his eye injury?
You cannot consciously think that Georgiev at $3.4 is anywhere near as good as Kuemper at $5.3 (even considering age and the $$ difference). Goaltending will be a question-mark again for the AVs and an honest review suggests it’s a clear weakness again.
...Yet he wasn't able to do it this season facing mostly non-Playoff teams.The Avs probably lose a few extra games in the regular season, but Kuemper was the weak link in the postseason and he's only getting older and slower.
Georgiev has to basically play above .900 SV% to match Kuemper's postseason play, which isn't too difficult. With Georgiev or Kuemper the goaltending would've been a clear weakness, but at least Georgiev has potential and gets paid less to keep the majority of the team intact.
...Yet he wasn't able to do it this season facing mostly non-Playoff teams.
Georgiev over a pretty extensive sample size in the NHL can’t do this during the Regular Season but you expect he will during the Post-Season? It’s not like the teams Kuemper played on over the years were markedly better than the Rangers yet his STATs are still superior. It’s possible you should temper your expectations for Georgiev.The Avs probably lose a few extra games in the regular season, but Kuemper was the weak link in the postseason and he's only getting older and slower.
Georgiev has to basically play above .900 SV% to match Kuemper's postseason play, which isn't too difficult. With Georgiev or Kuemper the goaltending would've been a clear weakness, but at least Georgiev has potential and gets paid less to keep the majority of the team intact.
any Maple Leaf farts and that's gonna generate 100+ replies.Keumper signs on first day of free agency and gets 80 posts.
Jankrok signs a week later when everyones on vacation and gets 350 posts.
Lol.
He's literally had 1 season out of 5 where he posted below .900 save percentage, and he had a .935 save percentage in the playoffs this year. I'm not disagreeing that Kuemper is a better regular season goalie and may be in next years playoffs, but given how bad Kuemper was in this years postseason run it won't change much even if Georgiev sucks.Georgiev over a pretty extensive sample size in the NHL can’t do this during the Regular Season but you expect he will during the Post-Season? It’s not like the teams Kuemper played on over the years were markedly better than the Rangers yet his STATs are still superior. It’s possible you should temper your expectations for Georgiev.
In the two games he played!!He's literally had 1 season out of 5 where he posted below .900 save percentage, and he had a .935 save percentage in the playoffs this year. I'm not disagreeing that Kuemper is a better regular season goalie and may be in next years playoffs, but given how bad Kuemper was in this years postseason run it won't change much even if Georgiev sucks.
In the two games he played!!He's literally had 1 season out of 5 where he posted below .900 save percentage, and he had a .935 save percentage in the playoffs this year. I'm not disagreeing that Kuemper is a better regular season goalie and may be in next years playoffs, but given how bad Kuemper was in this years postseason run it won't change much even if Georgiev sucks.
I mean there’s literally the rest of the post which provides a stronger argument and more context. My point was he never sunk those 2 playoff games like you’re suggesting he would.In the two games he played!!
If this is the strongest point of the strongest argument you can make it’s not a good one.
Thank You for this discussion I learnt a lot from it. Knowing this back ground noise makes the Kuemper deal make more sense. Do we pay 3 mil to Sammy or and VV maybe find their game or just sign someone we know will at least give us a better competitive chance.I'll take your word for it. You may actually understand it better than the website I used.
I was using numbers from a Caps related website [RMNB] which said:
"Monday, the Capitals decided to non-tender Samsonov a qualifying offer that would have given him a 10 percent raise of his salary last season ($2.4 million). That move would have allowed the Capitals to retain Samsonov’s rights, but the Russian netminder had the option of going to arbitration. Fearing a possible arbitrated salary of $3 to $3.5 million for a backup goaltender, the Capitals opted to let the young netminder leave the nest."
Bottom line was the Caps seemed to have decided that they were done waiting on Samsonov to develop into the #1 starter they thought they got when they burned a 1st round pick on him.
That’s a major simplification, implying all Georgiev has to do (or Frankie for that matter) is surpass last year’s playoff save percentage from Kuemper. Colorado was awesome and won anyway, but of course the save percentage risked them not winning. Maybe next year they’ll be in a series where circumstances dictate they need a save percentage of 93% to win.The Avs probably lose a few extra games in the regular season, but Kuemper was the weak link in the postseason and he's only getting older and slower.
Georgiev has to basically play above .900 SV% to match Kuemper's postseason play, which isn't too difficult. With Georgiev or Kuemper the goaltending would've been a clear weakness, but at least Georgiev has potential and gets paid less to keep the majority of the team intact.
Kuemper has been declining which is why many Avs fans have been wary about re-signing him. He had a poor 2020-21 season, a poor start to the 21-22 season and an inconsistent finish to the season. He had a few months of great play, but his stats this year in the regular season was inflated by playing on the Avs.That’s a major simplification, implying all Georgiev has to do (or Frankie for that matter) is surpass last year’s playoff save percentage from Kuemper. Colorado was awesome and won anyway, but of course the save percentage risked them not winning. Maybe next year they’ll be in a series where circumstances dictate they need a save percentage of 93% to win.
With all this said Kuemper’s career is very solid. Wasn’t the playoff slump obviously connected to the eye injury?