You may have watched a lot of hockey but i don't even know how you can state this . So team A trades player X to team B for 2 B,s . Player A is the best player but the 2 B,s help team X win 2 cups . How the hell did they lose the trade ? We missed the playoffs for 10 Fxxxxxx years and changing our D will probably have us making the playoffs . Even if we don't go far just getting the players to believe in themselves and the system is worth it . I find it funny people value a player over the team . I like Hall and wish him well , but he needed to go . Larsson has a bigger impact on the team then Hall did .
It's true. The Devils won that trade. They got the better player. I'm comfortable saying that.
With that said, I still believe the Oilers are a better team because they made that trade. They're a better team with Larsson patrolling the blueline than they would be with Hall at LW this season.
I'm of the opinion that you can make a trade where you lose from a player evaluation standpoint but still make your team better. I hope that makes sense.
Edit: I'll go as far as to say I'm pleased with Larsson on the team and I believe Chia made the best decision based on the options that we know were available to him at time.
Last edited: