the halleJOKEL
strong as brickwall
so you are saying he is bad at defense?
what you just described has nothing to do with leadership
what you just described has nothing to do with leadership
what you just described has nothing to do with leadership
No, it's not common to the same extent to all teams. And nowhere did I say that falls solely on his leadership. But but I contend that's one element of it, particularly when you look at how he plays and performs during those stints and when you add the other two items I mentioned that you neglected to include.
I think its both; I also think that trying to pin all of our woes on the leadership of Staal is stupid.Or maybe both? I agree the roster is poorly constructed, but when the guy who is the face of your franchise, and paid almost 15% of your total payroll isn't performing and is showing lack of consistent effort, taking bad penalties, etc... that's a problem. Not sure why you'd argue otherwise.
so you are saying he is bad at defense?
what you just described has nothing to do with leadership
eric staal is bad at defense
being made captain will not instantly make him good at defense
you cant just "leadership" your way to having defensive awareness
If a forward has speed and a minimal amount of hockey sense, being "good at defense" is mostly about effort. Eric has shown that he can be good at defense, so I don't buy that he doesn't have "defensive awareness". But even if we forget about whether or not he is good a defense, I'll repeat the question I asked earlier:
Can you honestly watch him not give consistent effort night in and night out and not question his leadership? Especially for a guy that says he leads by example?
Well, considering this is really the first year the majority have turned on Eric
When was the last time that Eric played a game in which he wasn't getting first-line minutes? At what point does he get challenged to give more of himself?
Eric might be complacent, but he doesn't strike me as someone who is without pride or who would pull a Hasek on his coach.
But at the same time, this organization has put Eric on so high of a pedestal, can you really challenge him in the way he needs to be challenged (ie: scratching him for a game or two or calling him out publicly) without putting your job on the line?
When was the last time that Eric played a game in which he wasn't getting first-line minutes? At what point does he get challenged to give more of himself?
Eric might be complacent, but he doesn't strike me as someone who is without pride or who would pull a Hasek on his coach.
When was the last time that Eric played a game in which he wasn't getting first-line minutes? At what point does he get challenged to give more of himself?
Eric might be complacent, but he doesn't strike me as someone who is without pride or who would pull a Hasek on his coach.
But at the same time, this organization has put Eric on so high of a pedestal, can you really challenge him in the way he needs to be challenged (ie: scratching him for a game or two or calling him out publicly) without putting your job on the line?
if muller feels that staal isnt playing to his full potential, then a period or two on the bench should get that message across. a game or two in the press box would also work. carolina fans are just sick of mediocrity every season, then once eliminated from the playoffs, the team and eric especially go on a ten game win streak in completely meaningless games.
This team needs to understand that when you make a catastrophic ****-up because of a lack of effort, it is not acceptable...regardless of how many goals you score. I do not see Muller sending that message. The only message I ever see is the "I'm benching you because you haven't even sniffed at a goal in 5 games" one, regardless of how obviously hard that player is working to rectify that situation.
They get the "20 min talk before practice" thing that Tripp mentioned last night with Eric and Muller.