- Oct 23, 2014
- 28,838
- 40,532
Appreciate this post - I won't pretend to know all the ins-ands-outs of the Montreal media, so I'll definitely defer to you. It's interesting that it's worse with Bergevin.
Is it with good reason though? Or is it all over the top? It's been a really poor 12 months for that organization and he's at the top
This..literally exactly this. Perfectly said.I personally think it's long overdue. Bergevin made a good first impression because he had some charisma and looked a lot more genuine than Gauthier who looked borderline creepy before him. It was a breath of fresh air, and even among fans he was one of the top candidate for the GM job at the time, so it was sort of an unanimous call. He seemed confident and he was coming out of Chicago, so people just figured he knew what he was doing.
But the more the pressure has built on, the less he could keep up the façade. The first time I recall he was at odds with a large portion of the fan base was the first contractual dispute with Subban where he forced him into a bridge deal which eventually came back to bite him in the ass - to no one's surprise.
But what really made him fall out of favor with the fan base is his over-commitment to Therrien, and by repercussion the fact the organization as a whole decided to favor a guy like Desharnais on the organizational depth chart instead of developing guys like Galchenyuk and Eller. That was the first big crack in the foundation. The Subban trade is what made a lot of people completely jump ship. That's when a lot of people realized he had no idea what he was doing. Not long before that you had the Shaw trade in spite of the fact he claimed multiple times he wanted to build this team through the draft, and the contract that followed shortly after was even worst than the trade in and of itself. And as people started calling him out, you quickly say the charisma and the confidence fade, and we were left with some kind of insecure narcissist that never really managed to own his mistakes. How ironic that this team's motto used to be "no excuses" when Therrien first came on board. The fact they started to pull excuses one after the other to explain whatever would ill the team at a given time ended up being such a comedy source that they had to get rid of the motto altogether. No joke, that actually happened.
The end result being, you have a guy here that took a team that had a 25 years old Carey Price, 23 years old Subban, Pacioretty and Eller, 20 years old Gallagher, 19 years old Beaulieu, a 3rd overall pick, and a decent amount of solid players in their prime like Plekanec, Markov, Cole, Gionta. The mission at that point was a fairly simple one. Find/develop a #1 center and surround your three young studs so that 5 years down the line you have a team that can hope to compete for a cup. Bergevin however never really had anything close to a long term plan and we find ourselves in the situation we're in today. We should be peaking right now and instead we're looking at a second lottery pick in 3 years. Our then young core is now in its 30s and won't hold up forever and after saying all these years he wanted us to build through the draft, we're currently sitting with one of the absolute worst prospect pool in the entire league.
So yeah, I do think it's with good reason. He managed to spoil the best young core this team had to work with in years, and he can thank Price for keeping up the appearances that this was a solid team for even a couple years, because even when we were winning division titles, everyone knew the team as a whole didn't play at that level. Bergevin didn't, though.
Basically, Mitch Melnick absolutely roasted Marc Bergevin in their interview the other day and now the clip has mysteriously disappeared from their website. Rod Francis' (the show's producer) tweet made it very clear that they were forced to remove it.
This isn't the first time that the Habs pull a stunt like this but what makes it even more pathetic is that this comes just days after Geoff Molson promised the fans and media that they'd be more transparent and open with everyone.
The interview can still be heard here:
[
I'd recommend listening to it ASAP before the Habs get to it.
Just two days after saying they will be more transparent...? WTF?What's that old saying about controlling the media and having power or something? I don't remember. But this is some silly drama here.
Pretty simple. Holtby also had a shitty year yet his record is still 34-16-4 and washington still made the playoffs with 105 points. Bergevin when asked why the habs were 29th in the league in scoring said it all starts with Carey Price, meaning his bad year. The guy got asked a f***ing question about his offense in the end of the year press conference and blamed the goalie. Why can the caps have their goalie put up similar numbers and make the playoffs and the habs cant contend for a spot the whole year?I thought some of the questions were quite ridiculous.
Why in the world are you comparing Washington to Montreal?
I personally think it's long overdue. Bergevin made a good first impression because he had some charisma and looked a lot more genuine than Gauthier who looked borderline creepy before him. It was a breath of fresh air, and even among fans he was one of the top candidate for the GM job at the time, so it was sort of an unanimous call. He seemed confident and he was coming out of Chicago, so people just figured he knew what he was doing.
But the more the pressure has built on, the less he could keep up the façade. The first time I recall he was at odds with a large portion of the fan base was the first contractual dispute with Subban where he forced him into a bridge deal which eventually came back to bite him in the ass - to no one's surprise.
But what really made him fall out of favor with the fan base is his over-commitment to Therrien, and by repercussion the fact the organization as a whole decided to favor a guy like Desharnais on the organizational depth chart instead of developing guys like Galchenyuk and Eller. That was the first big crack in the foundation. The Subban trade is what made a lot of people completely jump ship. That's when a lot of people realized he had no idea what he was doing. Not long before that you had the Shaw trade in spite of the fact he claimed multiple times he wanted to build this team through the draft, and the contract that followed shortly after was even worst than the trade in and of itself. And as people started calling him out, you quickly say the charisma and the confidence fade, and we were left with some kind of insecure narcissist that never really managed to own his mistakes. How ironic that this team's motto used to be "no excuses" when Therrien first came on board. The fact they started to pull excuses one after the other to explain whatever would ill the team at a given time ended up being such a comedy source that they had to get rid of the motto altogether. No joke, that actually happened.
The end result being, you have a guy here that took a team that had a 25 years old Carey Price, 23 years old Subban, Pacioretty and Eller, 20 years old Gallagher, 19 years old Beaulieu, a 3rd overall pick, and a decent amount of solid players in their prime like Plekanec, Markov, Cole, Gionta. The mission at that point was a fairly simple one. Find/develop a #1 center and surround your three young studs so that 5 years down the line you have a team that can hope to compete for a cup. Bergevin however never really had anything close to a long term plan and we find ourselves in the situation we're in today. We should be peaking right now and instead we're looking at a second lottery pick in 3 years. Our then young core is now in its 30s and won't hold up forever and after saying all these years he wanted us to build through the draft, we're currently sitting with one of the absolute worst prospect pool in the entire league.
So yeah, I do think it's with good reason. He managed to spoil the best young core this team had to work with in years, and he can thank Price for keeping up the appearances that this was a solid team for even a couple years, because even when we were winning division titles, everyone knew the team as a whole didn't play at that level. Bergevin didn't, though.
You have to know your market.
It used to be very similar here in Toronto - the Leafs and their media used to have a very antagonistic relationship with one another.
But that's changed recently - you don't get the flaming come backs or the sarcastic questions or the harsh tones anymore, because it's all managed far more professionally.
What? Nobody guessed on Staal, Turris and Karlsson? Minnesota, Nashville and LVGK did! That's why they are in the playoffs and the Montreal Canadiens are one of the worst teams in the league. Bergevin has not been able to get this team a SINGLE centerman in SIX YEARS! Nashville got 3 in one year. That's what good teams do. No excuses.
He's had 6 years to find a decent top 6 centerman, the only thing we have to show for it these days is a square peg (Drouin) that he's trying to fit into a round hole (#1C). At his most recent presser where he got roasted pretty good, he was wishy washy about a lot of things besides one: that Galchenyuk is not a C. The same Galchenyuk that played the best hockey of his life at that position and that's clearly a better fit there than his golden boy Drouin that he acquired for a king's ransom last year.Not trying to defend MG here (he's made a lot of bad decisions), but the interviewers giving MG **** about centremen such as Staal, Johansen, etc is crap. Montreal would've had his head if they signed Staal after what he did with NYR. Just because he wasn't able to trade for one of those top centremen, doesn't mean it was possible in the first place.
Did he have a Seth Jones to trade? Maybe Bonino didn't want to play in Montreal. Maybe they didn't have enough to get Turris. They seem to be just attacking him for things that may not have been in his control.
Attacking him for things like trading Subban for Weber is reasonable.
It's funny because Melnick completely ignores Bergevin's answer. I agree that MB has done a shitty job as GM, but "Washington is in the playoffs without their #1 goalie, why can't Montreal do the same?" is ridiculous. Maybe because their backup is having a career year that rivals both Price and Holtby's career averages? Maybe because Washington's forward group is one of the best in the league, backed up with great goaltending and a young D man having a vezina worthy season?I thought some of the questions were quite ridiculous.
Why in the world are you comparing Washington to Montreal?
Did they talk about the Sergachev trade in there at all?
Not trying to defend MG here (he's made a lot of bad decisions), but the interviewers giving MG **** about centremen such as Staal, Johansen, etc is crap. Montreal would've had his head if they signed Staal after what he did with NYR. Just because he wasn't able to trade for one of those top centremen, doesn't mean it was possible in the first place.