People focusing on Stall and when he was, as wasn't good, are missing the larger point that the interview was trying to make, I believe. Bergevin is being paid well north of one million dollars per year precisely to uncover diamonds in the rough, and undervalued players, whether they are Stall, Phil Kessell, or whomever. It is literally his job to fill in the holes in his roster, not to complain that it's hard to get a centre or that you're a Monday Morning Quarterback if you point out that Stall would have been a good acquisition, because "who knew he would be good?" (the team that made the playoffs, that's who). Guys who are good at it win Cups, or at least make the playoffs, because that's exactly what it takes to be a good GM. The media people he is accusing of second guessing are not paid to spot talent; they might try, but they are not the ones whose job it is to fix the team.
The funny thing is that Bergevin is actually pretty good at it when it comes to fourth liners, picking up guys like Paul Byron off of waivers, Petry for a draft pick etc. Also grabbed Radulov out of the KHL. He can get something for nothing, especially at the lower end of the roster (i.e. Bargain Bin) but is unable to make the big trades to fix the glaring holes in his roster down the middle, and on defence.
The funny thing is that Bergevin is actually pretty good at it when it comes to fourth liners, picking up guys like Paul Byron off of waivers, Petry for a draft pick etc. Also grabbed Radulov out of the KHL. He can get something for nothing, especially at the lower end of the roster (i.e. Bargain Bin) but is unable to make the big trades to fix the glaring holes in his roster down the middle, and on defence.