SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 52,671
- 34,643
The death of heavy hockey - Article - TSN
Thought it was somewhat relevant given the suggestion of a Ritchie for Kapanen trade.
Adapt or die. Hopefully Babcock can adapt.
The death of heavy hockey - Article - TSN
Thought it was somewhat relevant given the suggestion of a Ritchie for Kapanen trade.
maybe you got something about his play in practice? Because he hasn't gotten a fair chance in games that's for sure.Leivo is puzzling for sure. I always assumed it was things they saw in practice/off ice that they didn't like but then they went and extended him.
we'll see in the weeks ahead what direction the rebuild is taking, stay the course of screw the rebuild lets go for it at the cost of no return on impending UFA's.The fans would do it. Management wouldn't.
The idea that the project is over if we keep our UFAs is maybe the largest load of horse****, and the most severe dose of panic in this fanbase
The idea that the project is over if we keep our UFAs is maybe the largest load of horse****, and the most severe dose of panic in this fanbase
The idea that the project is over if we keep our UFAs is maybe the largest load of horse****, and the most severe dose of panic in this fanbase
Tampa as well last year. And one of their players (Boyle) was traded directly to the team they were in a dogfight with.NYR such a smart team. Looking to move valuable assets even while in the running for PO spot.
Friedman and Marek said on their podcast this week Leafs tried to get Barrie last summer.
Would never happen, but we could sign some UFA's to 1 year deals next year before Matthews/marner extensions kick in, and really go for a run without losing assets.
JVR (6M) Matthews (0.925) Marner (0.900)
Marleau (6.25) Kadri (4.5) Kapanen (0.900)
Sedin (5) Sedin (5) Nylander (6)
Hyman (2.25) Vermette (1.5) Brown (2.1)
Martin (2.5)
Rielly (5) Carlson (7)
Chara (5.5) - Zaitsev (4.5)
Gardiner(4.05) - Hainsey (3)
Andersen (5)
McElhinney (0.8)
Cap Hit Comes in at 78 Million
Realistically the only UFA's I could see us pursuing are JVR, Carlson, and maybe cheap depth, and sedins and chara are unlikely to leave their current teams
Brown-Matthews-Nylander
Marleau-Kadri-Marner
JVR-Bozak-Kapanen
Komarov-Moore-Hyman
Damn that would have been great.
Friedman and Marek said on their podcast this week Leafs tried to get Barrie last summer.
The death of heavy hockey - Article - TSN
Thought it was somewhat relevant given the suggestion of a Ritchie for Kapanen trade.
Then you turn JVR into something that fits the equation. But that might be too late now.Doesn’t surprise me - considering what they tried with Harmonic during the summer too
Issue is they’re likely trying to use JVR as their main trade chip and only teams in need of offense would be interested
Tampa as well last year. And one of their players (Boyle) was traded directly to the team they were in a dogfight with.
Bishop,Boyle,Drouin...time to move on.
some differences.
1; if they know said player is not going to sign w/them - it's easier to cut bait
2: if you know that you have no cap space for said players, it's easier to cut bait
so, if you feel that having ___________ here (it doesn't have to be leafs/their UFA), or you feel you can get a deal done, then it's not 'time to move on'.
(and w/Drouin, i think once he sat out, refused to report, and then Montreal gift-wrapped a top 4 defenseman in their lap, it was v. easy to make that deal. no one is doing that for us).
I’m on the fence about trading the Leafs guys, but with the Leafs situation, I’d say the signs are pointing to none of the UFAs returning next year. Which would more or less put them in the same situation as Tampa was, no?
What do you do to replace JVR Bozak Komarov and other UFA. Do you have a plan and the players to replace them for next season? Is your solution to trade for players you need? Is your solution to bring in UFAs? I am curious what you think is best and you can of course sign JVR Bozak or whoever but you need to be realistic and not say something like JVR for 5m.
It just seems to me you either lose them now with a return or you suck it up, get a low percentile chance at a cup an then take a step back next year. I would rather take the step back this year and go for next with new toys in the cupboard.