Market value is what an actor in good faith is willing to pay. Do you mean pay mare than some comparable analysis might suggest?
You still think I mean ignore PP time. Not surprised.
Here is the offersheet report:
Marner did not sign because he was concerned Leafs wouldn’t match. Instead signed at a discount.
No gun. He thinks Marner @ 12m is worth more than 4 1st rounders which is the standard compensation of the market.
And in this case, I wouldn’t even be acting in good faith matching an offer sheet since the crux of my decision would be based on ultimately extracting the most value out of the player in either scenario. Trading him on your own terms with 5 years left on his contract is better than taking 4 first round picks from a good team. Especially for a team like Toronto who wants to contend in each of those years.
Rantanen played about 450 more PP minutes than Konecny over their ELCs. Konecny out-scored him at 5V5 per 60 minutes and won’t get paid in the same stratosphere as Rantanen. He will probably get less than half. That’s just one example of how flawed your 5V5 P/60 analysis is when it comes to contracts. Timo Meier’s contract Vs. Sebastian Aho’s contract that have both already been signed is another example when Meier out-produced him per-60 at 5V5 throughout their entire ELCs and significantly so in their contract years.
That Tweet literally says that a team was considering presenting him with an offer sheet. It doesn’t even say that he was presented with it. And the source is Joey Vendetta. It’s very possible that it was pushed by Marner’s camp just like the 14/5Y offer sheet was pushed by Dreger.
By your logic, just about every single RFA ever has taken an extreme discount, and a much larger one than Marner. That isn’t really how things work.