Confirmed with Link: Tim Gleason want return a Caroline (1 yr/1.2)

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,961
39,054
colorado
Visit site
theres no reason for us to be worse as of today. marginally better is a likely result. 7-12 spot in the draft. a bunch of injuries could change that, but we aren't likely to be in the hunt for number one.

coaching could have a positive effect, and our offensive lines make a bit more sense than they did last year. our d is no better really, other than internal improvement possibly from faulk and murphy. sekera will be a bit lucky to do as well as he did, and will likely regress some.
 
Last edited:

Finlandia WOAT

js7.4x8fnmcf5070124
May 23, 2010
24,191
23,868
Anyone who looked at the 'Canes internal salary and at the ridiculous deals for FA defensemen (Orpik at 5.5 long term? :laugh:) knew that we weren't making a big splash unless we offloaded Ward for nothing.

Signing Tim Gleason isn't bad at all, considering he is clearly getting compensation for what he clearly is- a bottom pairing player.

Also, people keep saying that Cam Ward was handed the starting job...where is this?
 

Carolinas Identity*

I'm a bad troll...
Jun 18, 2011
31,250
1,299
Calgary, AB
The one thing that makes me curious is how they're going handle the bottom 2 pairs.

Sekera//Faulk is obviously the top and that's fine, but I'm curious about the bottom 2.

I can't imagine they'd pair Liles with Murphy, that has disaster written all over it. I'm thinking: Hainsey//Liles, Gleason//Murphy? Not idea, but it should be serivceable.
 

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,173
38,291
Anyone who looked at the 'Canes internal salary and at the ridiculous deals for FA defensemen (Orpik at 5.5 long term? :laugh:) knew that we weren't making a big splash unless we offloaded Ward for nothing.

Signing Tim Gleason isn't bad at all, considering he is clearly getting compensation for what he clearly is- a bottom pairing player.

Also, people keep saying that Cam Ward was handed the starting job...where is this?

Bob McKenzie strongly implied Ward was going into the season as the #1. Of course he is neither Bill Peters or Ron Francis and no one other than him has made that statement so I suspect it's only his opinion. And he knows MUCH less about the Canes with JR gone. People here just overreacted and took his word as gospel for no apparent reason.
 

VAcaniac

SHOOT THE PUCK
Feb 16, 2007
9,786
25,295
Los Angeles
Seems like a win-win to me!

Either

1) Cam stands on his head and makes RF look like a genious

or

2) We have a top 5 draft pick!
 

TheBigKahuna

Registered User
Dec 6, 2010
3,814
4,001
Canes Country
I hope Cam plays well enough to warrant a big trade before the deadline. No matter how you slice it, you can't continue to dish out over $8m to goaltending, unless you're dead set on a Cup run...and that's not happening.
 

Finlandia WOAT

js7.4x8fnmcf5070124
May 23, 2010
24,191
23,868
What I don't like is that RF can easily fall into a very narrow window here.

If Ward is playing well enough that we can offload him for a 6th rounder and retain minimum salary as the only condition, then he will probably be playing extremely well. 2009-2012 well- consistently keeping a team in the game that honestly has no business doing so.

But if he is playing that well, then barring another disaster season involving every forward under performing and massive injuries, then RF is not going to have much incentive to trade him.

He needs to go into this season with the goal to trade Ward unless Khudobin really craps the bed. Or at least have a clearly defined line for what Ward needs to meet before we decide to hang onto him.

Either way, I think that Ward is going to remain a 'Cane until FA 2016, then either re-up with us for less or search for a starting job somewhere else.
 

Anton Dubinchuk

aho
Sponsor
Jul 18, 2010
26,181
55,115
Atlanta, GA
What I don't like is that RF can easily fall into a very narrow window here.

If Ward is playing well enough that we can offload him for a 6th rounder and retain minimum salary as the only condition, then he will probably be playing extremely well. 2009-2012 well- consistently keeping a team in the game that honestly has no business doing so.

But if he is playing that well, then barring another disaster season involving every forward under performing and massive injuries, then RF is not going to have much incentive to trade him.

He needs to go into this season with the goal to trade Ward unless Khudobin really craps the bed. Or at least have a clearly defined line for what Ward needs to meet before we decide to hang onto him.

Either way, I think that Ward is going to remain a 'Cane until FA 2016, then either re-up with us for less or search for a starting job somewhere else.

Excellent post, I agree that there's a bit of difficulty here. The only way another team wants him for $6m a year is, in most cases, a situation where we'd want him for $6m a year too.
 

jstaal

go canes go
Apr 14, 2009
1,200
316
mass
msg

r23lIRn.jpg


But seriously, I'm a little down on him because of how slow he's gotten. But as long as we don't anoint him our fourth top four guy without making him earn it, I can live with it because there's very little commitment to this deal. Still wish we had a proper top four, but I think this is as good as it's going to get.
Feel better now??
 

jstaal

go canes go
Apr 14, 2009
1,200
316
mass
poll

Agreed.. It is also why players will not come here. Overpaid players that do not perform. Hell the islanders are now a better destination than carolina. So until ward eric and a couple other contracts expire or are traded, the team will be at the bottom. Stock pile draft picks and young talent and wait 5 years. There is a thread on this forum that asks who the bottom five teams will be. Buffalo, florida, and edmonton are pretty much on all posts. Canes are on about 2/3 of the replies... Pretty sad.

Just people opinions...
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,279
138,813
Bojangles Parking Lot
Not that it makes much difference, but there are an awful lot of Leafs fans complaining that Gleason and McClement were two of the only team-first, blue collar players on the Leafs. They seem to feel that the Leafs have basically neutered their defensive lines.

Considering one of our most pressing issues was finding some (productive) grit and team-first attitude, maybe it's not such a bad idea to bring these two on board.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,961
39,054
colorado
Visit site
I never minded Gleason between the ears or the heart, it was always the feet. On a cheap deal it's not a bad signing, I think we just all want the past to be the past. Not just in the actual players but in the mentality the old team had. No more retreads would've been a good idea for at least a year or two to show separation between the regimes.

McC is an awesome signing. I think we'll regret it only being one year. If we bomb we have some pieces to sell off this year.
 

cptjeff

Reprehensible User
Sep 18, 2008
20,700
35,268
Washington, DC.
Not that it makes much difference, but there are an awful lot of Leafs fans complaining that Gleason and McClement were two of the only team-first, blue collar players on the Leafs. They seem to feel that the Leafs have basically neutered their defensive lines.

Considering one of our most pressing issues was finding some (productive) grit and team-first attitude, maybe it's not such a bad idea to bring these two on board.

I do think it makes a difference. The culture of a team really matters- NHL teams and players are so close in talent that night to night, the mental game is a huge proportion of what determines success. Gleason's always been good on that front, and I'm happy to hear it about McClement as well.
 

nobuddy

Registered User
Oct 13, 2010
17,994
97
Nowhere
The more I think about it, I honestly would have much preferred giving Loktionov this contract.

Gleason has no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
39,259
41,300
I think there's a lot of assumption that, because a player played poorly last year, there's no possible way they can play well this year. I would hope the history of the Canes provides enough examples to say otherwise.
 

nobuddy

Registered User
Oct 13, 2010
17,994
97
Nowhere
I think there's a lot of assumption that, because a player played poorly last year, there's no possible way they can play well this year. I would hope the history of the Canes provides enough examples to say otherwise.

You're overgeneralizing it. Gleason was a trainwreck here and with Toronto.

Literally every Leaf was much worse with Gleason than they were without him.

http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/showplayer.php?pid=77&withagainst=true&season=2013-14&sit=5v5

That is beyond terribad.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
39,259
41,300
Ok, and how does that go against anything I said?

He was bad last year. No one's denying that. I think even Gleason has admitted that.

However, that does not mean he will be bad this year. There could have been mitigating circumstances that caused him to have a poor year last year that might not come into play this year. On the flip side, he could also just be over-the-hill and won't be any good this year as well.

Until it becomes obvious one way or the other, I find it hard to judge this signing as "awful", "horrible" or whatever overreaction there is over a depth defenseman signing.
 

Anton Dubinchuk

aho
Sponsor
Jul 18, 2010
26,181
55,115
Atlanta, GA
Ok, and how does that go against anything I said?

He was bad last year. No one's denying that. I think even Gleason has admitted that.

However, that does not mean he will be bad this year. There could have been mitigating circumstances that caused him to have a poor year last year that might not come into play this year. On the flip side, he could also just be over-the-hill and won't be any good this year as well.

Until it becomes obvious one way or the other, I find it hard to judge this signing as "awful", "horrible" or whatever overreaction there is over a depth defenseman signing.

I see where you're coming from, but he was REALLY bad last year. Unless the Canes explicitly KNOW of these circumstances, I don't feel like this holds much weight as far as actually making the decision to sign him. That being said, I do like this signing, I'm thinking of it as our Komisarek risk last year.
 

Tyler Biggs*

Guest
I would've kept this one Nonis. He would've gone great with Robidas and Polak. Phaneuf, Rielly, and Gardiner for points. Good luck back in Carolina Tim!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad