Yes best dman on the Generals, as the only drafted dman on the team...not really anything worth getting excited forIs that an Oshawa Generals award? As in for best defenseman on the Generals?
Brickley will probably sign with one of the bigger american markets (Chicago, NYR, etc).
I'd be shocked if we were even in his Top 5 despite the fact we have one of the worst defenses in hockey.
My only hope is that since he's from Utah he might be more open to a west coast team than a player that grew up on the east coast.You never know... here's hoping GMJB can work some miracles. We have an incredible group of young talent coming into the org, that's gotta get players excited. We'll see.
And in Pettersson's case literally zero of the comparable U20 SHL players didn't become impactful NHL players.
Sounds perfect for Vegas thenMy only hope is that since he's from Utah he might be more open to a west coast team than a player that grew up on the east coast.
Still don't think we have a hope in hell.
Much as I, like probably every Canucks fan, am excited about Pettersson's future, this statement made me wonder how many comparables are there for Pettersson among U20 SHL players. If there are quite a few comparables then the rest of my post is meaningless.
If it is just two players, Forsberg and Nilsson, then we have two statistical situations. The first is that among the many hundreds who have played in the SHL (SEL) over the past few decades only two have stood out to the extent that Pettersson has makes him an exceptional prospect indeed.
The second, on the other hand, is that looking at how those two did in the NHL, while not meaningless, is an exceptional example of small sample size statistics. It doesn't make for the near certainty that the statement "literally zero of the comparable U20 SHL players didn't become impactful NHL players" makes it appear to be.
In case anyone takes issue, I'm not arguing here that Pettersson is or isn't going to be an NHL star or NHL player. I'm just saying that using a statistically insignificant sample leads to statistical results that mean a lot less than they appear (no matter how much I like the result.)
I would put money on Vegas, Chicago, and NYR as 3 of those 5 teams.Sounds perfect for Vegas then
Lind two goals
We have an amazing D. Lots high end young stars, a 3rd overall, a 5th overall and an 8th overall. We will be adding another top 5 overall one this year.Brickley will probably sign with one of the bigger american markets (Chicago, NYR, etc).
I'd be shocked if we were even in his Top 5 despite the fact we have one of the worst defenses in hockey.
I am having a brain cramp on the 5th,unless you mean Joulevi. Also a 20th overall in there,he lays down the tracks.We have an amazing D. Lots high end young stars, a 3rd overall, a 5th overall and an 8th overall. We will be adding another top 5 overall one this year.
We have an amazing D. Lots high end young stars, a 3rd overall, a 5th overall and an 8th overall. We will be adding another top 5 overall one this year.
We have an amazing D. Lots high end young stars, a 3rd overall, a 5th overall and an 8th overall. We will be adding another top 5 overall one this year.
whaa?
Much as I like most Canucks fans am excited about Pettersson's future, this statement made me wonder how many comparables are there for Pettersson among U20 SHL players. If there are quite a few comparables then how the others did is meaningful, but if it is just two players, Forsberg and Nilsson, then we have two statistical results to point to.
The first is that among the many hundreds who have played in the SHL (SEL) over the past few decades only two have stood out to the extent that Pettersson has makes him an exceptional prospect indeed.
The second, on the other hand, is that looking at how those two did in the NHL, while not meaningless, is an exceptional example of small sample size statistics. Looking at how two players did doesn't make for the near certainty that the statement "literally zero of the comparable U20 SHL players didn't become impactful NHL players" makes it appear to be.
In case anyone misunderstands, I'm not arguing here that Pettersson is or isn't going to be an NHL star or NHL player. I'm just saying that using a statistically insignificant sample leads to statistical results that mean a lot less than they appear.
If the Canucks draft for position in the top 5, everybody should be fired.Pretty sure he was being sarcastic.
I said this earlier, but I’ll reiterate:
If the Canucks draft somewhere between 2-5, we will either draft Evan Bouchard or Adam Boqvist (Bouchard being more likely). In the unlikely event that we draft at the number 5 spot, and Bouchard and Boqvist have both been selected, we will draft Brady Tkachuk.
I’ll also go out on a limb and say that we will NOT draft Svechnikov or Zadina regardless of draft position.