how is bowie horvat a homer to the point of satire until it comes to the one singular thing he can be a homer about
Cuz if Henrik in his 11*?th Season in the NHl played like Bo Horvats first 40 games we would have the Stanely Cup
Last edited:
how is bowie horvat a homer to the point of satire until it comes to the one singular thing he can be a homer about
Cuz if Henrik in his 13*?th Season in the NHl played like Bo Horvats first 40 games we would have the Stanely Cup
henrik's last five seasons are all better game by game and in any run of games than horvat will ever be able to string together in his entire career. i love horvat already - but he will never, ever be as effective as henrik has been since 2008 through to right now
Efficient is a cop out for feasted on Edmonton/Calgary in regular seasonx3.
They'll have their chance to prove to me they're the best we'll ever have in about 2/3 years
that line was indisputably the best line in the league for a few years
I would love to just see them win a cup with us, but if not so be it. They are such classy people and my favourite representatives for our organization.
If we do win the Cup with them, and I hope we do because they deserve it. They will not be our point production leaders.
and other players in the league didn't feast in Calgary and Edmonton? Henrik Sedin in 2009/2010 had the most even strength points since Mario in the 90's. it's hilarious seeing the pathetic excuses on here.
to be fair, the minority opinions keep the discussion going. or else it's just: benning sux. i agree. how about that sbisa extension? you know it. high fives all around.
That's all those threads are.
What's hilarious are the excuses people make for them in the playoffs.
Sure, great regular season players, not doubting that. But they aren't the same players come playoff time. I also question how good of a leader Henrik is. Completely ignoring the fact that he doesn't lead the team in the playoffs, he also hasn't been much help in bringing along youth players like people think he does. If he were, we'd have gotten through to Kassian. Hodgson wouldn't have had all those issues. And we wouldn't need the Dorsetts and Prusts of the world for guys like Horvat to "rub shoulders with."
and other players in the league didn't feast in Calgary and Edmonton? Henrik Sedin in 2009/2010 had the most even strength points since Mario in the 90's. it's hilarious seeing the pathetic excuses on here.
58 points in 62 games for henrik sedin since 09/10. in b4 you cherry pick the san jose series. im not posting further on this topic, we've had our debates over the years I've wasted way too much time on this.
Kinda like how you cherry picked using 09/10 too?
What's hilarious are the excuses people make for them in the playoffs.
Sure, great regular season players, not doubting that. But they aren't the same players come playoff time. I also question how good of a leader Henrik is. Completely ignoring the fact that he doesn't lead the team in the playoffs, he also hasn't been much help in bringing along youth players like people think he does. If he were, we'd have gotten through to Kassian. Hodgson wouldn't have had all those issues. And we wouldn't need the Dorsetts and Prusts of the world for guys like Horvat to "rub shoulders with."
Kinda like how you cherry picked using 09/10 too?