Isnt there a well known saying that the hardest thing to do in the NHL is score? If the offense with Toby is more than dry, ideally we can insert someone who is still defensively responsible but at least has the confidence/ability to shoot the puck?
That’s great that he can prevent shots, but I think you have to be more dynamic than that if you want playing time/roster spot on a Stanley Cup contender
No clue if that saying really means anything. It seems just as meaningful as "defense wins championships" or other meaningless quotes.
That said, offense DOES drive results more than defense does. That said that doesn't mean a person good at defense should be ignored just because they don't drive offense.
Honestly, I'd argue that preventing goals is actually harder, because people poorly evaluate who actually is good at defense. Generally speaking, people conflate that for being safe. It is true that offense slightly drives success more than defense, in part due to the voodoo that is goaltending.
The whole dynamic argument is BS too. Dynamic is a qualitative description of how a player garners results. Measure of results is something else. Substance vs style. Hockey is simple: if GF > GA, then result=win. GF is (almost, if pedantic) equal to GA.
Now that said, even if you were right, that's an overly simplistic way to look at things.
I'm going to make up numbers as an example...
A: One guy is replacement level offense and is 95th percentile in defense.
B: One guy is replacement level defense and is 65th percentile in offense.
Offense is 55% of the battle and defense is 45% of the battle.
A may be a larger impact and harder to get than B.
Offense may be harder to come by (and
slightly drives results more than defense), but elite defense is not easy to come by and worth more than meh offense.