Confirmed Trade: [TBL/NSH] Tanner Jeannot for Cal Foote, c. 2025 1st round pick, 2024 2nd round pick, 2023 3rd, 4th, and 5th round picks
- Thread starter MMC
- Start date
Sun God Nika
Palestine <3.
- Apr 22, 2013
- 19,936
- 8,296
OVO16
#WeTheNorth
- Apr 16, 2017
- 10,102
- 9,856
Alex1234
Registered User
- Oct 14, 2014
- 16,255
- 6,420
Goons with3 assists in 13 games usually come a lot cheaper if not for free though lol
In the same time frame as the trade even Ullmark has scored more goals....
1 goal, 3 assists, 4 points in 20 games and a -6.
And now he’s injured and likely to miss most of the playoffs unless Tampa make a deep run.
This is probably one of the worst trades in NHL history.
And now he’s injured and likely to miss most of the playoffs unless Tampa make a deep run.
This is probably one of the worst trades in NHL history.
Wanted him on NJ but not at that price....Regardless of what he brings he won't live up to that trade....Hope he gets healthy and gets going....
- Jun 17, 2009
- 10,227
- 6,299
Looks like a disastrous trade so far. Brisebois just couldn't help himself, he got validated the last 3 times he made this trade. To make this worth it, he needs to sign Jeannot to a cost-controlled contract and hope he turns it around. I really hope that injury isn't serious, it looked pretty bad.
Arthur Morgan
Registered User
I think people are missing that part of the return was for taking McDonagh last summer when Tampa really needed to unload him. Arguably the 2nd and 3rd round picks part of the return was for that. Just like the give and take between Yzerman and Armstrong in St. Louis where Yzerman sent them a retained Vrana for fre as a TY for the Leddy and Fabbri trades. GMs usually try to cultivate these relationships especially if their teams are in opposite conferences, comes in very handy to have someone on the short list if you're Tampa trying to keep your window open while needing to navigate the cap game after game
Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 79,441
- 55,143
Why would there be any continuity between those two trades? The McDonagh dump worked well for Nashville since they got a great player back for nothing. Tampa didn’t owe Nashville anything in addition.
Jeannot could have been/could be a unique Tom Wilson style asset. Hasn’t worked out this year and he’s now hurt but that’s the reason why a premium was paid. Cause he can be a special power forward with 30+ goal ability. One thing I don’t like about him is he’s already 25 and the primes of power forwards is often unpredictable. If he was a rookie coming in at 20 or something last year and had the scoring season he had, this trade would have been a really good one for Tampa.
McShogun99
Registered User
Trade already looked bad the day it was made. Now it just looks worse. Imagine spending an entire draft worth of assets for a 3rd/4th line winger.
Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 79,441
- 55,143
Neutrinos
Registered User
- Sep 23, 2016
- 8,635
- 3,627
Many were critical of the Hagel acquisition, as they felt the Bolts had grossly overpaid
Hagel then went on to score 4 goals, and just 7 points in hist first 22 regular season games with Tampa, before registering just 2 goals, 6 points in 24 playoffs games
That was last year
This year Hagel has 28 goals, 61 points in 78 games with the Lightning
Maybe the Jeannot trade will look much better in the years to come than it does at the moment
Hagel then went on to score 4 goals, and just 7 points in hist first 22 regular season games with Tampa, before registering just 2 goals, 6 points in 24 playoffs games
That was last year
This year Hagel has 28 goals, 61 points in 78 games with the Lightning
Maybe the Jeannot trade will look much better in the years to come than it does at the moment
Gurglesons
Registered User
Ryan Clowe and David Clarkson got huge contracts based on what they did from 25-28.
If Tampa can get Jeannot for a low cost RFA deal for the next three years and he performs like Clarkson and Clowe did in those years this is a fantastic deal.
GreeningOil
Yarpmeister
Is Jeannot going to be playing with Point and Kucherov next year too? I personally don't see that as evidence of Hagel's effectiveness when his linemates have 30-50 more points than him.
TheDoldrums
Registered User
I'm actually really curious about the next contract Jeannot signs. It seems like Tampa spent so much for him because they assume he'll sign cheap long-term and he probably will. Certainly shouldn't have much leverage based on his stats this year. But if I'm his agent, I'm trying to use the acquisition cost as a way to prop up his value. This isn't like Hagel who was already locked in long-term.
bov
Registered User
- Nov 13, 2010
- 7,220
- 3,347
The chances of any of these picks even playing a game for Nashville, let alone make an impact within 3 years are slim.
The injury is very concerning but he has plenty of time to find his game before the rest of the trade plays out.
There's also the possibility that TB trades Jeannot down the road to recoup some assets. Judging this trade now is moronic considering it hinges on 5 futures.
The injury is very concerning but he has plenty of time to find his game before the rest of the trade plays out.
There's also the possibility that TB trades Jeannot down the road to recoup some assets. Judging this trade now is moronic considering it hinges on 5 futures.
Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
True.
Though, imo it's fairly clear the Bolts management made that trade more so for the short term impact than the longer term.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
BET ON ONLY ONE HORSE WATCH LIVE - FORT ERIE RACE 7 - Niagara/BuffaloWagers: 3Staked: $606.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
-
Stanley Cup PICK ONE TEAM ONLY - 2024 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONWagers: 4Staked: $1,400.00Event closes- Updated: