MuckOG
Registered User
- May 18, 2012
- 15,573
- 5,611
Why not just play out the string with Suter? He is still a top 60 Dman, IMO, and significantly better than Goligoski. Would rather pay Suter to be on our ice, than pay him to NOT be on our ice, and have to pay Goli, which has resulted in a greater financial penalty for the team, nvm play on the ice.
I get that he would've been overpaid, but not grossly so. Just because he isn't what he used to be, doesn't mean he's useless.
Parise buyout, I get. The guy was toast.
Its pretty obvious that Guerin felt that Suter needed to go for reasons other than just his play on the ice. If it was just about what Suter can contribute on the ice, then I think he is probably still on the roster.