Depending on what his statline reads at the deadline, he might find himself in the 2015 Havlat or Ryder territory, of not being wanted by any other teams. Parenteau (As of now) was better than him and only brought back a 6th rounder.Anyone else looking forward to the trade dead line and Stafford is launched into space?
Honestly though, 3-on-3 is pretty much just a breakdown waiting to happen. We still got a point on the road with a depleted forward group.
I don't know much about him, but probably an AHL player, considering who he was traded for.Devils got Latta for Kujawinski? Hmm
Vatanen wasn't good at all tonight lol, -15 shot differential
on a side note didnt travis play tonight? didnt see him.......
To go further, that's also more of a terrific play on Hudon's fault more than a bad play on anyone that was on the ice.
Sometimes even if you do everything right, bad things happen.
Yeah the last play sucked, but what exactly were our odds gonna be in the shootout anyway...10% maybe?
Neither did Bratt the shift before. It happens.
plus/minus shots stat is even more useless than plus/minus..... he had a decent game and made some good choices with the puck. they got a point with a depleted line up and young team.... ill take it. he's just adjusting so lets give him some time no? i think the last sequence is proof he might even be trying to do too much. he needs to keep it simple.
Because Wood is a loose cannon and plays out of control
Let's not ignore the fact that the Canadiens are a throw the puck at the net from every angle team.
Devils went scoring chance for scoring chance with them 5-0n-5. Kept the Canadiens to the outside, limited east-west play, and prevented any shots from in close.
The above means more to me than any CF/CA means. I'd take 20 shots attempts the Canadiens took tonight over a one timer or a clean cut breakaway.
Missed the game, how was my guy Pavel tonight?
Missed the game, how was my guy Pavel tonight?
Couldn't any worse than that **** show at the end there.
I have doubt you'd probably justify Greene over Severson in the OT as well.
that last one tho... ahhhhh. kidding of course. thats just 3v3 in a nutshell.
After watching it a few more times I think Coleman saw Zacha and Vatanen and thought they'd win the puck battle and he was looking to go on the attack rather than thinking about covering the late guy. Hudon just made an unexpected play and that's all it took.
Breakaways and odd man rushes are anticipated in 3-on-3. They're bound to happen with all the open space.
You're going to lose and win some 3-on-3 games just by shear chance. 5-on-5 is much easier to control though.
I missed the game, just glad we got a point. How did we look otherwise?
I saw Dallas play the Isles live in Brooklyn and they destroyed the Isles. I don't have much confidence for Friday sadly. Hope we surprise them!