LOL Before I read the caption I thought this was Stammer on Halloween or somethingEver noticed the occasional resemblance with Prince Bernhard Jr. of the Netherlands?
LOL Before I read the caption I thought this was Stammer on Halloween or somethingEver noticed the occasional resemblance with Prince Bernhard Jr. of the Netherlands?
You can make as reasonable and sane an explanation as you want; there are those here who will forever support certain players regardless of what keeping them means to the short and long term future of the entire organization.What about potentially freeing up $7M+ in roster space and getting 5-10 years younger at one or two forward positions?
You can make as reasonable and sane an explanation as you want; there are those here who will forever support certain players regardless of what keeping them means to the short and long term future of the entire organization.
I agree.I support Stamkos. I just don't support overpaying him.
Nevertheless, the New York Post's Larry Brooks wondered if Stamkos might be targeted by the Bruins as a playoff rental now that Winnipeg's Mark Scheifele is off the market. They started this season with Pavel Zacha and Charlie Coyle centering their top two lines.
While it is still early in the season, your post may well be something we have to think about around first of the year.The scary thing is we might actually wind up in a position to rent Stamkos out to someone else come March. Kind of makes me wonder if JBB wanted to keep that option open, thus not working toward a Stamkos extension in the off season.