The trade is looking more acceptable as time goes on, but as I said before, we lost...and it's really no one's fault. Okay, maybe, Eugene.
If all our assets bust (although I think Chiasson is a pretty safe bet to be a decent to good hockey player and a 2nd in our scouting staff hands is always a good thing), yes we
will lose then. But why use "lost" as it is impossible to talk in the past for a trade that just happened. Not even 1 game has been played since. I'm not sure why some people do that?
But anyway, I don't see it that way.
Who knows if Spezza wouldn't have been injured if he played for the Sens this year? And for how long? That things we will never know and maybe we just dodged the big bullet of losing Spezza as a UFA next summer.
Knowing that he wasn't going to extend with the Sens, all we lost in the end is 1 year of Spezza. The problem is not the trade in itself but the short term incapacity to retain our big UFAs (that will change a bit but Ottawa will always be Ottawa). Some will stick and be patient enough (Methot? Ryan? MacArthur?), but some others think their time is counting down (Alfie, Spezza) and thought it was now or never to win the Cup. The age doesn't always matter, it's how you feel in your body. Back problems is not an easy thing, maybe Spezza "feel" more than 31 and he has to be on contending teams ASAP. It wouldn't surprise me if he leaves the Stars as a UFA next summer
Would it still be a "clear win" (not that I find this notion of win-loss for trades very realistic but I have to talk in HF terms) for Dallas if Spezza walks and they have an "ok season but not great", like a 1st round loss? If they reach the SCF (win or lose) maybe even the ECF, I think it will have been worth it but if not? Also what if Spezza is injured? The risk is huge for them
Chiasson (23 y/o on ELC), Guptill (21 y/o), Paul (19 y/o), 2nd in a very deep draft
Took over 6 millions in cap hit in the process.
Let's not act like they didn't give up some assets and spent money.
For the Sens, it gave them budget space to sign Legwand to a 2 years friendly deal and save 1 million (for 2014-15) in the process, for a guy that had 15 less points last year while being a much better 2-way player. Then you got those 4 potential good assets.
Of course, I always rather give up quantity to get quality, but the quality in Spezza WITH the Sens was not going to last that much longer. It was the right timing to trade him, trade demand or not.
Maybe in 4 years, one of Chiasson or Guptill is a very good player and we got another very good prospect with the 2nd. And the budget flexibility...