Hawkaholic
Registered User
You did. Otherwise you wouldn't have a problem with Bowman giving him away.
No I didn't, I said I don't think Bowman wants to give him away.
You did. Otherwise you wouldn't have a problem with Bowman giving him away.
We won't be able to keep any of them past this year I bet, so it's not a big deal to me either way. Keep Oduya for this year at least, Imo.
We won't be able to keep any of them past this year I bet, so it's not a big deal to me either way. Keep Oduya for this year at least, Imo.
At this point, I think Bowman would give away Versteeg/Rozy for free if there were any takers. That wasn't the case two months ago, but now it has to be. Otherwise, you're saying he'd stubbornly hang onto Versteeg because he can't get fair market value for him, at the expense of having to trade a player with actual value, i.e.. Leddy.
Why do you think a team would give up a 1st for Leddy? He hasn't proven to be a top 4 defender and teams know the Hawks are in a bad spot with cap
Sending Rozy down to AHL is not viable and doesn't get Hawks under cap as he would carry 975k cap hit and Hawks would need to replace him on roster
Why do you think a team would give up a 1st for Leddy? He hasn't proven to be a top 4 defender and teams know the Hawks are in a bad spot with cap
Sending Rozy down to AHL is not viable and doesn't get Hawks under cap as he would carry 975k cap hit and Hawks would need to replace him on roster
Sending Rozy to AHL leaves team 397+K over cap
Replacing him with another player leaves team nearly a 1M over cap
Leddy is worth a 1st. I've had this argument so many times it's crazy. I'm not restyling the pages of justification but I'll give you cliffs:
1) His stats say he is
2) Bowman's cap dump trades say he is
3) his age says he is
4) his advanced stats say he is worth more than a 1st.
Trade Leddy on his own. Think you can get a 1st for him solo. replace with Cumiskey.
Trade for nothing/Waive Roszival. Bring up TVR/Dahlbeck.
If the bottom pair doesn't work out you can make an inexpensive bottom 2D deal in season/at the deadline.
Not a terrible solution.
I'm more than baffled at some who think Bowman would rather hang on to an undervalued Versteeg than an undervalued Leddy, especially when they at the same time say Versteeg has no value at all now & may never have any (yet for some reason believe that hanging on to him will increase his value, making the assumption that he is worth a lot...). I think the real issue is some just don't like or see any value in Leddy, which I don't think is a view Hawks management shares.
Bowman isn't going to hang on to a guy who at his best might be worth a 3rd round pick, while dumping a guy who is worth at least a 1st, for a 2nd or 3rd rounder
A 1st round pick is worth exponentially more than a 2nd which is exponentially worth more than a 3rd...based on the historic odds of those picks making it in the NHL.
Yet we have posts suggesting that since Bowman will be able to snag a 3rd rounder for Leddy, but nothing for Versteeg, he's going to deal Leddy.
Does not compute.
If trading Leddy was the plan, this should have been done months ago, back when Bollig was worth a 3rd. It will be insane if/when Leddy can't return much more than Bollig.
How much do you think Toews and Kane will be making next year?
Leddy is worth a 1st. I've had this argument so many times it's crazy. I'm not restyling the pages of justification but I'll give you cliffs:
1) His stats say he is
2) Bowman's cap dump trades say he is
3) his age says he is
4) his advanced stats say he is worth more than a 1st.
To be honest, no one here thought trading Bollig would net us a 3rd. A 5th maybe. Bowman may surprise us with the Leddy trade (though don't count on it).
If I had to guess, 10.5mil each.
That is why I don't see Bowman dealing Leddy now, especially if they can't get fair value for him. It AIN'T happening.If trading Leddy was the plan, this should have been done months ago, back when Bollig was worth a 3rd. It will be insane if/when Leddy can't return much more than Bollig.
1) His defensive play says he is not
2) This trade is nothing like past cap dump trades
3) 300+ games and still not top 4 say he is not
4) His defensive stats say he is not worth a 1st
I hope I am wrong but expecting a 1st for Leddy at this point is setting yourself up for disappointment
I don't agree he'd get that at this point of time. But it would be easier for me to understand your position if you could give a few examples of specific teams who you believe would, right now, give up their first for him (being sure to bear in mind the team's cap position because obviously we can't afford to take on salary in return).
Let's work backwards here. What do you think Jake Gardiner was worth before he signed his new contract? I'd say somewhere around a 1st + good prospect.
I think us Hawks fans are constantly shocked at the return for our players (Brouwer, Buff, etc) because our bad players ARENT BAD. Shocking revelation. The quality of player you are watching far exceeds what others are watching. It is a bias all us fans have, someone has to be a scapegoat. Leddy compared around the league is shockingly competent defensively and top, top tier offensively especially when you factor in his age.
I think you are operating under the assumption that I am talking about a 2015 1st. I agree that the list is probably pretty short if you are looking for a 2015 1st. Teams have a good idea of where there teams will be this season. Florida, SJ spring to mind.
If you make it a 2016 1st I think you get a lot more trade partners accepting that deal.
Gardiner straight up to me was worth 2nd + prospect. He has talent but is a bit overhyped at this point
Its nearly October again those cap trades are not at all comparable to situation the Hawks face now
Also with the 2015 Cap Purge on horizon the future status of Leddy and his very costly qualifying offer needs to be factored into likelihood that he is traded as well
Ok, what teams do you think that would be?