Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,259
- 49,890
On Hfsens naturallyWhere we gonna find a $50 Million dollar coach??????
On Hfsens naturallyWhere we gonna find a $50 Million dollar coach??????
Look reality in the face? A little ironic coming from some. Aren't I super negative? And think all the players are bad. And think our GM (the pro) has failed in building a good team and our coach (a pro) has failed in whatever he's tried to do. (Those last two are correct).
I'm just not a standings watcher. I can honestly say I look at the standings exactly 0 times a season. Yeah we'd have to be a lot lot better. If Andy improves. That's a couple more points right there. But whatever. One game at a time.
Brutal
I know it's probably slim. But I mean. So what? I'm still gonna watch every single game. I think it's far from impossible thoughFans who only look at the "points behind the playoff spot" like you seem to be, are kept interested, in the season, for longer than most........... with the mistaken belief that the Senators are "only 7 points behind" the Bruins (who have a game in hand) and if "Andy get better, that's two points" that the Senators actually can easily catch the Bruins and cruise right into the playoffs.
History shows that teams NOT is a playoff spot by US Thanksgiving, almost always never find a way to make the playoffs.
Sure there are exceptions, and I for one would love to see the Senators claw back into the playoff race, just like the Hamburglar run ............. but I also know the odds of Lightning striking twice, in the same place, for the same team, are astronomical.
You don't want to acknowledge the math, that show the Senators odds of making the playoffs are somewhere between slim and none ............ that's fine, focusing on the "only 7 points behind" mindset will just keep your hopes going longer into the season that fans that take a logical look at the whole picture.
I know it's probably slim. But I mean. So what? I'm still gonna watch every single game. I think it's far from impossible though
Why are people talking about firing the coach?
This team played all of last year with speed, discipline, structure, a system, they attacked the neutral zone, they turned over pucks, they generated scoring chances, they got average to above average goaltending.
None of that exists anymore. Is that literally only the coach's responsibility? There's something very clearly wrong with this team and I honestly don't think it has anything to do with Boucher or his system. This guy prepares meticulously. He's extraordinary with detail. He adapts game plans to opponents. Do you seriously think he isn't trying anything and everything he can think of to get this team back on track?
Something has very clearly happened somewhere along the way. These guys look like they're skating uphill every game. They can't keep pucks on their sticks. They can't win foot races to loose pucks. They're getting beat on the board and basically everywhere on the ice. They bobble passes. They can't think the game properly and it's been the case ever since they got back from Sweden. They were 8-3-5 before they left Sweden and had one of the best point percentages in the NHL. Since they've come back they have been THE worst team in the league.
Someone explain to me how that's the fault of the coach or the GM? Did Guy Boucher come back from Sweden and all of a sudden forget how to coach a team?
The math on ceci is real too. You still defend him.I'll also watch, or attend, the remaining games as well ........ but I don't,in any way, have any hopes, right now, that they can catch the Bruins.......... the math is just to real.
^^^ We can't tank with Erik on the team. So either it's tank job without Erik, or try to win with him. Those are the two options.
They can't tank with EK, but they can have a bottom 5 finish this season, get a top-end draft pick, and then retool.
Yip. Agreed. That's the best case scenario right now. Which also means I would keep Boucher for the time being. There is no advantage right now in firing him. Is there some can't miss coach out there that we could possibly hire? I don't know of any. The only reason to fire Boucher is if he lost the room and the players hate him. I don't know if that has happened.
Who assembles the team and decides the way they play? Teams aren't randomly assigned players by the league.And some people here seem to think it's the Owner, The GM and the Coaching staff's fault.
How would any changes in ownership, management and coaching change those stats?
^^^ We can't tank with Erik on the team. So either it's tank job without Erik, or try to win with him. Those are the two options.
Who assembles the team and decides the way they play? Teams aren't randomly assigned players by the league.
It starts from ownership. You get what you pay for. A shoe-string budget gets you budget management/coaches/scouts. You're essentially trying to win on expert mode.
I agree with all you said but did not understand the last sentence.
I know it's probably slim. But I mean. So what? I'm still gonna watch every single game. I think it's far from impossible though
I'll be rooting for Nashville if Sens are out. But if Sens are in I despise all others.I am going to watch all the remaining games too because I am a strong Senators fan. Come playoffs, I will watch and hope for the Jets to do well. I have a love-hate relationship with TORONTO as I was as fan in my youth when the Original Six were the league.
On Hfsens naturally
Agreed. Simmer has nothing to lose and doesn't care.Simmer speaks his mind but then it's "wow. So. Negative. ".
It doesn't matter any more, but you still have to wonder how anyone can watch a video, slow it, freeze it, see this image and still say no goal. Even from this view it's clearly in, and that's not even considering that the puck was on edge, so the contact point with the ice is another inch and a half farther over the line. Why have replay if they're just going to screw up the call a second time?How on earth is that not a goal?????
The thing is, last year it wasn't a rigid system, despite the whining of ill informed and bitter non-Sens fans. They would switch in and out of different looks, depending on the situation, and that made it hard to counter. It looks like everyone is a step ahead of Ottawa this year, instead of a step behind.It appears that Boucher has changed his rigid 1-3-1 system to one that includes more forechecking. That has not worked either.
A defensive-oriented system works well for offensively challenged players but is not optimum for offensively gifted players. The system needs to be different for each line and/or set of 5 players (3F & 2D). Square pegs in square holes and Round pegs in round holes.
Seems like the players have quit on the team, not on the coach. I'm sure they would love to put it on the line for Boucher as he has always had their back and they did well together. But all of the decisions seem to be made with $ in mind, even to the detriment of the team.