ijuka
Registered User
- May 14, 2016
- 22,709
- 15,559
I mean, Laine uses a pretty low flex stick, which doesn't signify massive power. And yes, there does exist such a physical phenomenon, it's the "bounce effect".Sorry, but this post of yours is absolute bull crap. I mean reading these kind of posts makes me feel that some guys here have skipped school and especially physics and biology completely. The lack of understanding of basic physics and physical facts is just unbelievable in a mind boggling way.
No physical phenomenon which has an end result of very quick acceleration, fast speed and velocity can happen without a huge major factor happening through the source of power and strength. So the key is always in the muscles when high velocity and speed are achieved. If you don’t have great strength and power, it is physically impossible to move anything with any mass in a very quick or fast way. Any kind of a technique can of course help in concentrating your strength and power a bit better and using them more efficiently. But when talking about professional athletes at the absolute top in any sport, they all are that good technically, that seriously they can only polish their abilities through their technique, compared to the other top athletes. The biggest factor comes from their physical gifted abilities and how well they manage to improve them with the right kind of training methods for their individual body and their individual development path.
Your comment about Laine’s shot being 90% achieved by technique is utter bull crap. Sure there is a part that comes through his very well working technique, but to seriously talk about it being even close to 90% is absolutely absurd and silly. The power and the velocity come most of all from how well his muscles can produce the quickness and the strength for using his stick and body to produce enough power to have a damn hard shot. That doesn't magically happen with having a great technique. The technique doesn't create the great amount of energy that is needed to make something with weight move extremely fast. The technique can only polish the efficiency for the usage of the already existing great amount of energy to be used more efficiently in creating the wanted fast movement on the wanted object.
It was well documented that it was largely about technique for Laine so I'm not sure why you're going about revising history. And why you still write such long messages. How many people do you think bother reading them fully?
Last edited: