That's great. I was a fan of plenty of players the Bruins moved on from. I don't go back and hindsight them all. It's just lazy. I just don't get the point.
1.) Reilly Smith = Traded in a package for Seguin. This deal was made by the buffoon in Edmonton. So technically, he wasn't a true Sweeney guy. His final season here, he was not good. He was soft, and useless when not scoring. The Bruins decided to move on. The trade was not good. Jimmy Hayes sucked. We get it. They were able to move Savard's contract in the deal as well, but at the end of the day, you will not find anyone who won't say this wasn't a bad trade. That said, why is it ignored how Smith ended up in Vegas? He had a not-so-good season, after signing a big contract worth 5M a year. His extension was going to kick in, so Florida gave him away to Vegas for a 4th round pick. It's easy to hindsight it even more now with Smith going on to have a great season on a team that seems to touch gold everywhere. He's not the only one to go there and find the horseshoe up his ass. Go down the list. Plenty upon plenty of career years there.
2.) Brett Connolly = Traded for, by the buffoon in Edmonton. His production and play was lackluster. Not a Sweeney guy so they moved on. He hasn't done much more in Washington. No idea why he is being mentioned at all. This is a dime-a-dozen kind of player at this point. You can find these guys on July 1 and late into the summer.
3.) Colin Miller = Every team had to lose someone at the expansion draft. Bruins chose to expose him. What Colin is doing in Vegas was not necessarily what he was going to do here. Different role here and different style of play. Still blah mediocre in his own end. I don't get this one either because you needed to lose someone, and the Bruins choice to keep Kevan wasn't bad. He's a good defenseman as well. Points are flashy, and that's why you're *****ing about it.