aufheben
#Norris4Fox
Nash was not terrible for the Bruins. Grabner contributed practically zero production.
Assume we don’t trade anyone else out
Kreider Zibanejad Buchnevich
Spooner Hayes Zuccarello
Namestnikov Chytil Fast
Vesey Andersson Lettieri
Now if we trade away Zuccarello and Spooner that’s two spots. Andersson moves up and Nieves as 4C. That’s now one spot for a free agent.
Not really. Subban and Karlsson are both WAY more talented
Assume we don’t trade anyone else out
Kreider Zibanejad Buchnevich
Spooner Hayes Zuccarello
Namestnikov Chytil Fast
Vesey Andersson Lettieri
Now if we trade away Zuccarello and Spooner that’s two spots. Andersson moves up and Nieves as 4C. That’s now one spot for a free agent.
Yep, and I think Chytil and Andersson should definitely have spots available.I would hope Chytil, Andersson were on the level of ADA/Pionk. I have no idea if Howden is there or not.
Good, because I don't think there's anyone else that needs a spot.If they are trading Zucc, Spooner, Name and just replacing them with free agents it's not opening up any more spots.
Kovalchuk, sure. You see Nash and Grabner commanding 3+ year deals or restrictive no trade clauses? If so, I'm ok with moving on to the next target.The contracts that are designed to be movable, I'm not sure I see the motivation on the part of the specific players being mentioned to signing that sort of deal? Nash, Grabner, Kovalchuk are going to be taking 1 or 2 years without clauses?[
This conversation is odd because it sounds like the pool of players we are allowed to pick from is Nash, Grabner, Kovalchuk and our own forwards.
Something no one has mentioned is Matt Belesky. Chance to build value and be a trade deadline move. He didn't live up to his contract but essentially was a cap casualty. Maybe he sucks and gets buried with us but he could be our new project.
And just a "devil's advocate" point from a few pages back regarding logjams. JAM. Sometimes you don't know until they get a shot.
I think Lias will end up as a top 9 winger this season.In this scenario, I'd have Andersson in Hartford playing top line minutes and Nieves manning 4C for the Rangers.
Yep, and I think Chytil and Andersson should definitely have spots available.
Good, because I don't think there's anyone else that needs a spot.
Kovalchuk, sure. You see Nash and Grabner commanding 3+ year deals or restrictive no trade clauses? If so, I'm ok with moving on to the next target.
Assume we don’t trade anyone else out
Kreider Zibanejad Buchnevich
Spooner Hayes Zuccarello
Namestnikov Chytil Fast
Vesey Andersson Lettieri
Now if we trade away Zuccarello and Spooner that’s two spots. Andersson moves up and Nieves as 4C. That’s now one spot for a free agent.
Assume we don’t trade anyone else out
Kreider Zibanejad Buchnevich
Spooner Hayes Zuccarello
Namestnikov Chytil Fast
Vesey Andersson Lettieri
Now if we trade away Zuccarello and Spooner that’s two spots. Andersson moves up and Nieves as 4C. That’s now one spot for a free agent.
Hayes for Pesce is the new meme, nerd.We need a RD that can eat tough minutes. Not because I think Shattenkirk can't do it, but because it's a waste of Shattenkirk to use him in that role. That's the biggest hole on this team. Possibly even the only true hole. Just call Carolina about Pesce and be done with it. Should've traded Miller for Manson two years ago.
But then again, if we're not trying to compete, just throw Pionk there like we did last year and see what happens.
Ew. I don't want to do that.Hayes for Pesce is the new meme, nerd.
How else do you expect us to get Pesce? Vesey and a 2nd? <- That is a rhetorically bad offer, not a real one for clarification, because I know some jags that think that would be fair.Ew. I don't want to do that.
Spooner+? We trade Hayes all we do is plug one hole and open another.How else do you expect us to get Pesce? Vesey and a 2nd? <- That is a rhetorically bad offer, not a real one for clarification, because I know some jags that think that would be fair.
The way our Rangers south team ended I say we did pretty good with our Trades
Mac ran out of gas again
JT strong start then disinterested and sloppy play
Rangers traded their captain, a 1st and a conditional 1st/2nd for a 5'8" guy with just over one year left, so I don't think those factors play quite like you think they do.Keep Zucc (idk why everyones so convinced a 5'9 guy with 1 year left is getting the 13th pick or whatever. still a 1st liner)
Trade Spooner if at all possible
Keep Zucc (idk why everyones so convinced a 5'9 guy with 1 year left is getting the 13th pick or whatever. still a 1st liner)
Nieves on the 4th, only keep the best of Lias/Chytil/Howden on the roster, let the others crush the AHL
1 of Grabner/Nash on a good contract all day. Neither have anything they're actively weak at, good dudes, good defensively, whats the problem
Only sign Kovalchuk if you trade Zucc. You can't pay your 3rd line LW 5M+.
Next year is probably the year the D corps turns over
I mean, I’m not eager to move Hayes — I just think that’s the only way we could get him. I don’t think Carolina would even consider Spooner+, personally.Spooner+? We trade Hayes all we do is plug one hole and open another.