I doubt this very much.
As well as the fact, I find it very hard to believe that Fletcher would have traded Steen etc with Burke being hired roughly a few days later.
Yes.
Steen & Cola were traded Nov. 24th.
Burke was hired Nov. 29th.
and as I firmly doubt that this happened within that week. I do feel that the theory of, Burke was feeding Cliff some suggestions relatively accurate.
and EVEN if it's not- Brian Burke isn't as amazing as everyone is trying to wax poetic about.
yeup.
We've eliminated almost 2.5 draft classes of Burke's tenure here. we can remember Rielly but hello - look at Edmonton: What do we have AFTER him? (from the Burke era) ............
They only needed 7 more players to round out the roster, and had most of their top six and top 4 already signed. And they weren't a bottom end team, they were a playoff team that took the scary Boston Bruins to 7 games and you could argue that if Carlyle didn't mismanage the team, they could have beat the Bruins. They had the most cap space out of any team that made the playoffs and there was a decent free agent class to pick from.
No doubt Burke would have handled the Sundin situation much better, that alone would have changed the course of this team dramatically.
Many things Fletcher did were hard to believe, he shouldn't get a selective pass on that one.
that's a nice positive spin of looking at things.
if we didn't have Burke, we don't have Nonis
if we don't have Nonis we don't have those last two years
we don't have Rielly, Nylander and Marner.
i can live with that.
so why did the elite team-core continue to **** the bed the following seasons
I think you're missing the bigger picture. If you want to say that Burke made some small positive moves, I can agree with that. But there is one move that defined his time here, and that is the one move that set us back. It doesn't matter what he did outside the Kessel trade because all of his other moves combined still had a smaller effect than the Kessel trade.
you mean. Burke would have handled the Sundin situation better than telling Sundin he wasn't in the plans of the team and they were heading in a different direction? Sure, I guess.
Fletcher did a lot of weird things
the Finger v. Sauer thing
Trading up for Schenn
but most people are most irrate re: the Steen/Cola trade. which - I feel was influenced by Burke. I don't think that was being selective.
and quite frankly, seeing what Burke did in 5 years here, I have zero idea why people feel it would have been better had to gone straight from JFJ to him, or that we were capable of big, amazing things had we only kept Burke around.
his drafting history is crap. Basically if he's in the top 5 or so, he gets the home-run right (the Sedins, Pronger, potentially Rielly). he got Kessler. But for the most part his drafting record is crap, his trading record is relatively split, and his cup win, was basically built on B. Murary's work, and lucking out on a lot of situations (ie: Mrs. Pronger wanting Pronger to be traded, and R. Neidermayer wanting to play with S. Niedermayer).
So I don't know why people feel Burke would have made a significant difference here.
no team breaks camp with 20 players unless they are capped out so stop with the bs
the free agent class was crap and that same great core went to **** the bed again
saying we had the most cap space means nothing without context since your not saying how many players the other teams needed to sign
What core?
You let your highest scoring line walk for nothing (Grabo - wasted a compliance buyout, MacArthur - left in free agency, Kuli - walks a year later). All of whom expressed great distaste for their coach and usage on the ice. they weren't scoring when they made the playoffs , that was the previous season when we did our first cliff dive , in fact that line all had weak offensive years and all have gone on to do very little
You trade your best defensive player (Gunnarson) ALONG WITH a draft pick for an older player who even when he got here was playing further down the lineup (on a BAD maple leafs team) i like Guunner and that was a bad deal from the get go but that was after another cliff dive and not the season following our playoff year
You introduce a goaltending "competition" after the best year of a young Reimer's career. Basically throwing him under the bus because you see some apparent need for a #1 goalie. Bernier had a good year when we acquired him and the team still did a cliff dive so i have no idea what point you're trying to make
You try to preach accountability and say that good play will lead to more ice time. Meanwhile you refuse to bench Clarkson and play him on the PP for godsake. and Burke preached accountability and still played Connoly-Komi among others when they should have been sitting in the press box so again what's your point ?
Shall I continue?
you mean. Burke would have handled the Sundin situation better than telling Sundin he wasn't in the plans of the team and they were heading in a different direction? Sure, I guess.
Fletcher did a lot of weird things
the Finger v. Sauer thing
Trading up for Schenn
but most people are most irrate re: the Steen/Cola trade. which - I feel was influenced by Burke. I don't think that was being selective.
and quite frankly, seeing what Burke did in 5 years here, I have zero idea why people feel it would have been better had to gone straight from JFJ to him, or that we were capable of big, amazing things had we only kept Burke around.
his drafting history is crap. Basically if he's in the top 5 or so, he gets the home-run right (the Sedins, Pronger, potentially Rielly). he got Kessler. But for the most part his drafting record is crap, his trading record is relatively split, and his cup win, was basically built on B. Murary's work, and lucking out on a lot of situations (ie: Mrs. Pronger wanting Pronger to be traded, and R. Neidermayer wanting to play with S. Niedermayer).
So I don't know why people feel Burke would have made a significant difference here.
The Leafs top 6 was already sorted, the average 3rd liner was getting maybe 3M? and they had their goaltending tandem already. The free agency class had Iginla, Jagr, Clarkson, Clowe, Filppula, Weiss, Horton, Raymond (which panned out) Visnosky, Regehr, Hainsey, and even some decent goaltenders. It was a good market for 2nd line guys that can shore up a team with talent, which was what the Leafs were.
What did Burke leave us with:
Kadri and Rielly
JVR and no prospects!
Komi, Liles, Grabo, Connolly, Lambo,
Percy, Biggs, Ross, Finn, etc
No Seguin, Hamilton etc
No I mean he would have no doubt handled the situation better than Fletcher did. The Sudin matter had already played out before Burke arrived.
Burke did leave the team with a significant amount of capspace - Nobis managed to destroy that fairly quickly, as well as trading multiple picks.
Nonis is every bit as complicit for the team's current state as anyone else. We were just lucky they found a taker for Clarkson.
False.
http://www.thestar.com/sports/hockey/2008/11/29/burke_says_sundin_unlikely_to_join_leafs.html
It should also be pointed out the Phaneuf trade was pretty amazing and he is probably still our best player. I know it is more fashionable to hate Dion but he is a very good player
The Leafs are in the position they are now because of a decade of truly terrible management. JFJ, Fletcher, Burke, and Nonis all share blame for the position the Leafs are in.
But.... Kadri, Rielly, Percy, Biggs, Ross, and Finn were all.. prospects? I don't understand. Also Lebda got us Lombardi and Franson which got us a 1st, Leipsic, and a 4th. Which.. is pretty spectacular for Brett Lebda.
How is it false? Sundin was already UFA by the time Burke arrived.
You said it had played out when obviously he had not decided his destination yet. Mats wanted to be a Leaf but was not wanted and moved on. He had not signed with anyone and ultimately it was Burke who told him he was not a good fit. This is the opposite of what you said thus making it false.
Percy may still be a Leaf....the rest Biggs, Ross and Finn were horrible picks, among the worse in the NHL.
Franson we got because we took on Lambardi contract as he was injured(major concussion) and he had years reminding on his contract. It was money(10,500,000) and not Ledba that got us Franson.