Confirmed with Link: Rangers acquire Jack Roslovic from Columbus for a 4th round cond. pick.

GENESISPuck94

Registered User
Sponsor
May 2, 2022
3,391
6,365
NJ
Would trading a 1st + Cuylle/Berard/Edstrom as part of the Guentzel package made you happy? That would have been aggressive right? Not many big trades went down in the east and the Rangers dodged a bullet not getting Guentzel. The Buch trade would have been very expensive also. That's why he wasn't traded.
Yea, that would have been a disaster.

It's frustrating because they didn't do enough, couldn't without sacrificing their entire future... but also didn't do anything the other way around either.

They kind of "stood pat". Unless Roslovic goes off some how. Wennberg im not expecting much from at all.
 

Captain Lindy

Formerly known as Kreider Beast
Apr 1, 2006
15,107
11,126
Virginia
I bet JD gave him an earful about playing in New York! He looked genuinely happy in his first interview. Good for him. Best of luck.
 

PuckLuck3043

Stairway To Heaven
Nov 15, 2017
9,852
14,758
Hudson Valley
I bet JD gave him an earful about playing in New York! He looked genuinely happy in his first interview. Good for him. Best of luck.
IMO this deal was a steal for the Rangers and it came with retention. A 2026 4th rounder is basically nothing. I'm surprised JD helped the Rangers out on this one after being fired.
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
52,028
30,580
Brooklyn, NY
Spooner was actually pretty good right after the deadline with 16 points in 20 games. After that it was all downhill. We need a good Roslovic for the next 40 games or so.

Yes, but if he IS Spooner do we get that Spooner or the one from the following year. If we could trade him for another almost PPG Center I'd take it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PuckLuck3043

TopShelfSnipes

Registered User
May 5, 2011
1,101
1,790
USA
Late to the party, but love the Roslovic trade. Good dude, very humble, enjoys playing the game and interacting with fans...can skate stickhandle and shoot. Has under the radar top end skill but not quite physical enough or strong enough on puck protection to put it all together. Hopefully he can unlock 20-93 at even strength.

For a 4th, a guy that produces at his rates is an absolute steal. This one move redeemed the deadline from a dumpster fire, to make it a solid B in my book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
32,266
22,308
Late to the party, but love the Roslovic trade. Good dude, very humble, enjoys playing the game and interacting with fans...can skate stickhandle and shoot. Has under the radar top end skill but not quite physical enough or strong enough on puck protection to put it all together. Hopefully he can unlock 20-93 at even strength.

For a 4th, a guy that produces at his rates is an absolute steal. This one move redeemed the deadline from a dumpster fire, to make it a solid B in my book.
You didn't like the Wennberg move? I feel like he can be a good fit 3C for this team.
 

TopShelfSnipes

Registered User
May 5, 2011
1,101
1,790
USA
You didn't like the Wennberg move? I feel like he can be a good fit 3C for this team.
It could be, but my initial reaction was it was kind of a lateral move. It's one of those moves that will be judged on chemistry in the end. At first glance, a guy who puts up <.5PPG while playing 19 minutes and winning 46% of faceoffs doesn't seem like a big upgrade though, but last night he had a good game.

I've thought this team was 3 pieces away from seriously contending, and Roslovic could be one piece...Wennberg could be another. Ruhwedel is depth mostly. But really hoping the formula this playoffs is to actually be a good even strength team that pushes the pace, rather than a team of PP specialists that relies on goalieing their opponents every game.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
32,266
22,308
It could be, but my initial reaction was it was kind of a lateral move. It's one of those moves that will be judged on chemistry in the end. At first glance, a guy who puts up <.5PPG while playing 19 minutes and winning 46% of faceoffs doesn't seem like a big upgrade though, but last night he had a good game.

I've thought this team was 3 pieces away from seriously contending, and Roslovic could be one piece...Wennberg could be another. Ruhwedel is depth mostly. But really hoping the formula this playoffs is to actually be a good even strength team that pushes the pace, rather than a team of PP specialists that relies on goalieing their opponents every game.
Brodz? Brodz to Wennberg a lateral move? I appreciate the effort Brodz brings but Wennberg is way more proven and a better player than Brodz.
 

TopShelfSnipes

Registered User
May 5, 2011
1,101
1,790
USA
Brodz? Brodz to Wennberg a lateral move? I appreciate the effort Brodz brings but Wennberg is way more proven and a better player than Brodz.
Wennberg is better in his own end but based strictly on Brodz's numbers this year vs. Wennberg's the last two years, it's not an immediately apparent upgrade. Wennberg's Points Per Game rate is higher, but he's playing 70% more than Brodz was.

The key will be if he's able to find chemistry with Kakko and Cuylle to outperform his Seattle numbers the past two years.

With Zibanejad shitting the bed all season, I still think this team is one serious scorer away from being a top contender. They'll need to outperform expectations to get past a Florida, or even a Boston which I can still see giving them fits if the PP goes into any kind of slump or we start getting goalie'd. And that says nothing about how we'd fare against a Colorado or Edmonton that could easily outskill us if we get that far.

I think the deadline wasn't great, but the Roslovic addition helped salvage it. You don't have to agree. But Wennberg hasn't been a 50 point player in years, and he was a 46-47% possession player who wins 46-47% of faceoffs and <.5 PPG playing almost Mika minutes for Seattle. The assumption is that's what we're getting, again, unless he develops unexpected chemistry with Kakko and Cuylle.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bleedblue94

PuckLuck3043

Stairway To Heaven
Nov 15, 2017
9,852
14,758
Hudson Valley
It could be, but my initial reaction was it was kind of a lateral move. It's one of those moves that will be judged on chemistry in the end. At first glance, a guy who puts up <.5PPG while playing 19 minutes and winning 46% of faceoffs doesn't seem like a big upgrade though, but last night he had a good game.

I've thought this team was 3 pieces away from seriously contending, and Roslovic could be one piece...Wennberg could be another. Ruhwedel is depth mostly. But really hoping the formula this playoffs is to actually be a good even strength team that pushes the pace, rather than a team of PP specialists that relies on goalieing their opponents every game.
Wennberg is the better player AINEC. He was playing 2nd line minutes for Seattle and was good in the playoffs. Brodzinski is a AAAA level player. It's more than just points. He plays defense, Is able to carry the puck in the Ozone and distribute to his wingers. Both Cuylle and Kakko will benefit from the upgrade.
 

BS45

Registered User
Aug 20, 2022
155
229
where ever its 5pm
Wennberg is better in his own end but based strictly on Brodz's numbers this year vs. Wennberg's the last two years, it's not an immediately apparent upgrade. Wennberg's Points Per Game rate is higher, but he's playing 70% more than Brodz was.

The key will be if he's able to find chemistry with Kakko and Cuylle to outperform his Seattle numbers the past two years.

With Zibanejad shitting the bed all season, I still think this team is one serious scorer away from being a top contender. They'll need to outperform expectations to get past a Florida, or even a Boston which I can still see giving them fits if the PP goes into any kind of slump or we start getting goalie'd. And that says nothing about how we'd fare against a Colorado or Edmonton that could easily outskill us if we get that far.

I think the deadline wasn't great, but the Roslovic addition helped salvage it. You don't have to agree. But Wennberg hasn't been a 50 point player in years, and he was a 46-47% possession player who wins 46-47% of faceoffs and <.5 PPG playing almost Mika minutes for Seattle. The assumption is that's what we're getting, again, unless he develops unexpected chemistry with Kakko and Cuylle.
You forget Wennberg was playing against the other teams best center/line and Brodz was playing against the other teams 3/4 in sheltered minutes. That is the problem with the numbers/ people just use them and compare player to player based on numbers with no context at all. Thats why I hate the numbers and prefer to use the eye test and go by what I see. Wennberg is an bonifided NHL caliber player and is a #2 center on a weak team and a #3 on a very good team. Brodz is a borderline NHL center/ very good AHL player.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad